- Posted September 7, 2013 by
This iReport is part of an assignment:
Are chemical weapons a ‘red line’?
Is this a Movie or Real Life?
I wanted to know what could not be reported on the news such as the Money and friends in the Government behind the Conflict in Syria?
I was exposed to the Government and was exposed to how it operated. One thing I learned was about the friends in the Government connected to Government Contracts and how money was awarded. I was very greatful that I had work but I got to see how things operated. There was stress and people would act a certain way when it came to budgets it was the only way to get work. One thing I got to see was the Military. Military makes money from things and people make money from the Military. I can see some what is being covered by the news and it seems it is hiding this method. You can see all the News Coverage on the President and Congress but you don't see all the friends behind them. Someone is going to make money if they decide to bomb Syria. There would be a budget and a contract. Someone is going to get a contract before and once a bomb is dropped. Someone is going to make money. The way you have been reporting the news it looks like they are hiding something. The words they having been choosing in talking to the public. They don't seem sincere in there response about Chemical Weapons as being the real reason behind there reasons. What is the current status of the Government and Military? Is it time to spend Money?
I could see lots of Contracts being made from a Conflict in Syria in the United States and in Foreign Countries. That seems to be more a reason than what appears to be a response to Chemical Weapons. It sounds like they are using it as an excuse so they can start spending.
My Father and I have been discussing this as we are both against the United States getting involved.
I am using my limited knowledge on how the goverment works and how it spends money. My Dad who was in the Air Force told me the cost of some of the weapons that would be used and gave me an idea what it would cost to replace them such as ammunition. That made me think of Contracts and who would benefit from them.
What would happen if people were more informed about who would benefit from such a conflict. If it was reported it would be interesting to see how things would get done if people knew.
I have found your news coverage strange about the Conflict in Syria. I worked in the Film and Television industry and you can't write a worse script for a Movie than what you have been reporting on CNN and other news Services. The United States appears to be the Bad Guy and Using Propaganda in order to sell the Idea. It does not sound like a hero coming to the Aide of a Country because of Chemical Weapons it sounds more like Spending. Just watch your Cast in your real life Movie and think of what you have been reporting. I am not sure people see it this way but it looks like a very bad movie from my point of view only that is real life.
How can you be a real leader when you have to think how many people could die if they decide to bomb Syria. How can you be the Good Guy. Is not the United States suppose to be the Good Guy?
I am going to create art work so you can see what it really looks like.
I am an Artist and this is what real life looks like.
(I noticed that the image I created was cut off with the preview that CNN provides. I suggest using Adobe Photoshop to view the File so you can see it all and including what it says.)