- Posted February 23, 2014 by
Good and Bad.
Recently there's a little diatribe in Italy, concerning the attitude expressed about the cinical line or the sensitive one. It regards, in few words, the ancient and very discussed war between good and bad, two concepts that are part of the same reality, impossible to divide and impossible to solve. To be good it's the same choice of to be bad and nobody may say which is the most difficult way between them. It's just possible to affirm that not everybody may do choices, considering that the great side of people must do something don't love.
But the problem in this contest, it concerns the talking, or better to say the topics which are faced with a passionate or cinical position. Some of our actions could be considered bad choices for the community, but, in a legal frame, they are admitted. The weight of morality is more or less in each one of us so it could drive to judge a single action as good, less good, bad or more bad. To talk about "bad", it represents a fundamental initiative, because it's always necessary to investigate over the reasons which cause a bad action, to understand the root of a choice, the first fault which drives a subject toward a way rather than a different one. In this information era, often we are exposed at bad news, and day by day, we get habitude about them as if all the world were nothing different. Day by day we may risk to forge our personality from the ache which is around us, forgetting something good which disappears under the big wave of bad. It needs to be balanced in a sort of infinite wisdom, to be always careful and awake, able at the death perception, which is just a single act of our whole life.
Guidonia, 24 of february, 2014 h. 1.17 am. Mario R. Zampella