Share this on:
 E-mail
49
VIEWS
0
COMMENTS
 
SHARES
About this iReport
  • Not verified by CNN

  • Click to view paulhugel's profile
    Posted April 6, 2014 by
    paulhugel
    Location
    Kahului, Hawaii

    More from paulhugel

    Dr. Lorrin Pang FDA insights

     

    While attending a GMO Rally in Kahului, Maui on March 30, 2014 I spoke to Dr. Lorrin Pang and questioned him about issues within the FDA science community. I was delighted to learn about this once confidential internal FDA study highlighted below. Although not the best news one could hope for it definitely shed light on the severity of the issue at hand.

     

    Dr. Lorrin Pang explains some of the issues facing FDA scientists in regards to GMO safety.
    #mauigmo
    The specific online PDF document can be downloaded and reviewed by the public.

    FDA Science and Mission at Risk.
    Report of the Subcommittee on Science and Technology
    Prepared For FDA Science Board
    November 2007
    URL shortened: http://1.usa.gov/1mKEJat

     

    The FDA scientists point out:

    “The FDA cannot fulfill its mission because its scientific base has eroded and its scientific organizational structure is weak”.

    “The FDA cannot fulfill its mission because its scientific workforce does not have sufficient capacity and capability”.

    “The FDA cannot fulfill its mission because its information technology (IT) infrastructure is inadequate”.

    “Finding: FDA does not have the capacity to ensure the safety of food for the nation”.

    “Finding: The development of medical products based on “new science” cannot be adequately regulated by the FDA”.

    “Finding: There is insufficient capacity in modeling, risk assessment and analysis”.

    “Finding: The FDA science agenda lacks a coherent structure and vision, as well as effective coordination and prioritization”.

    “Finding: The FDA has substantial recruitment and retention challenges”.

    “Finding: The FDA has an inadequate and ineffective program for scientist performance”.

    “Finding: The FDA has inadequate funding for professional development”.

    “Finding: The FDA has not taken sufficient advantage of external and internal collaborations”.

    “Finding: The Subcommittee believes that there is evidence of important, but slow, progress to improve information sciences and technology at the FDA over the past few years, yet significant gaps remain”.

    “Finding: The FDA lacks the information science capability and information infrastructure to fulfill its regulatory mandate”.

    “Finding: The FDA cannot provide the information infrastructure support to regulate products based on new science”.

    “Finding: The FDA IT infrastructure is obsolete, unstable, and lacks sufficient controls to ensure continuity of operations or to provide effective disaster recovery services”.

    “Finding: The IT workforce is insufficient and sub optimally organized”.

    “Finding: The FDA has experienced decreasing resources in the face of increasing responsibilities”.

    “Finding: Recommendations of excellent FDA reviews are seldom followed”.

    What do you think of this story?

    Select one of the options below. Your feedback will help tell CNN producers what to do with this iReport. If you'd like, you can explain your choice in the comments below.
    Be and editor! Choose an option below:
      Awesome! Put this on TV! Almost! Needs work. This submission violates iReport's community guidelines.

    Comments

    Log in to comment

    iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.

    Add your Story Add your Story