Share this on:
 E-mail
10
VIEWS
0
COMMENTS
 
SHARES
About this iReport
  • Not verified by CNN

  • Click to view linyinjane's profile
    Posted July 27, 2014 by
    linyinjane

    More from linyinjane

    UK rushes emergency surveillance bill

     

    Urgent legislation is being passed through the British parliament after the European Court of Justice struck down an EU directive in April requiring phone and internet companies to retain communications data on the grounds that it infringed human rights. This rush through legislation involves the adoption of emergency data law so as to allow police and security services to continue to monitor phone and internet records. Given the real threats to the British security from serious organized crime, from the activity of pedophiles, from the collapse of criminals and terrorists. In fact, this emergency legislation is expected to be introduced as an independent bill or as amendments to the serious crime bill going through parliament now.
    The legislation is chiefly aimed at the companies that provide telephone and internet connections. It outlines calls made, when and who people called, texted and emailed and what numbers dialed, without including the content of messages and phone calls. Overall, this law must be rushed through to maintain national security, according to the British government.
    But this has raised critics and questions on whether there is enough transparency, accountability and oversight. David Davis, Conservative MP and and longstanding campaigner on civil liberties, thinks the government enacts a theatrical emergency. Ms Cooper believes this will set serious concern in Parliament and across the country at the lateness of this legislative proposal and the short time to consider something so important. And The Open Rights Group accused the government of using the threat of terrorism to push through an "emergency law" as it has no legal basis. As for the Executive Director Jim Killock and the Labour backbench MP Tom Watson, they claim this legislation infringes the people’s privacy and liberties. As for privacy campaign groups, they fear the move implies the continuation of "privatised snooping", that is, governments pay companies to record what citizens did and keep that information for a year. In response, Jim Killock said this new legislation is disproportionate and unnecessary and believes it is a waste of money.
    In response to those critics, David Cameron highlights that this is a powerful and necessary tool to restore emergency surveillance as it has always solved serious criminal cases.
    This legislation will likely will likely come into effect next week after being passed through the Commons. It will be reviewed in 2016 after next year's general election.

    What do you think of this story?

    Select one of the options below. Your feedback will help tell CNN producers what to do with this iReport. If you'd like, you can explain your choice in the comments below.
    Be and editor! Choose an option below:
      Awesome! Put this on TV! Almost! Needs work. This submission violates iReport's community guidelines.

    Comments

    Log in to comment

    iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.

    Add your Story Add your Story