102
VIEWS
0
COMMENTS
 
SHARES
About this iReport
  • Not verified by CNN

  • Click to view CrystalCox's profile
    Posted May 21, 2015 by
    CrystalCox
    Location
    Las Vegas, Nevada

    More from CrystalCox

    Marc Randazza, Nevada Attorney repeatedly uses frivolous legal action to intimidate critics.

     

    Marc Randazza, Nevada Attorney repeatedly uses frivolous legal action to intimidate critics.

     

    Las Vegas attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is ONLY out spoken on Anti-SLAPP laws for his career and is NOT an advocate of Free Speech nor is Marc Randazza or Randazza Legal Group against the filing of frivolous legal action to intimidate critics.

     

    Anti-SLAPP statutes are important to protect free speech that is true. However, Nevada Marc Randazza is NOT a sincere in his efforts to protect TRUE Free Speech Rights of all.

     

    Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group, my former legal counsel, sued me for millions, shut down my blogs, stole my domain names and intellectual property, lied to media and publications world wide, lied and provided false sworn statements to WIPO and to Federal Court Judges, and he encouraged others such as dozens of law firms, Forbes, AboveTheLaw.com, attorney Kenneth White of Popehat.com, attorney blogger Scott Greenfield, NPR, WIPO and more to paint me out as a criminal in order to attempt to discredit what I was TRUTHFULLY reporting about him.

     

    Nevada attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group sued blogger Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers because she spoke critical of him, and of his wife. He sued her for defamation for speaking her mind, for posting a parody graphic she made and for insulting his wife.

     

    Really Marc Randazza sued  Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers because she dared to report on him, expose his connections to pedophile authors, his support of the Free Speech Coalition and all they are connected to, his bullying tactics to attempt to silence porn industry whistle blowers, his law firm hiring and connected to stalkers, and his connections to alleged organized crime.  So to silence his critics, and to intimidate whistle blowers , he simply had his law firm Randazza Legal Group sue her.

     

    Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has a pattern and history of suing people like me, Crystal Cox, as well as Alexandra Mayers, Diana Grandmason and Eliot Bernstein. And all because we dared to stand up to him, to speak freely, and to actually express our First Amendment Rights.

     

    Marc Randazza once claimed it was unAmerican to sue Rush Limbaugh for calling Sandra Fluke a slut, yet he later sued Monica Foster and me, Crystal Cox and made claims that we had called his wife a slut. Marc Randazza can't seem to make up his hypocritical mind. Is it ok to call someone a slut Marc or not? Well I guess as long as it is not his wife, its A ok.

     

    My Rip Off Report speaking CRITICAL of Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group

     

    I posted a rip off report about my experience with Marc Randazza and his law firm Randazza Legal Group. This report was very high in the search engines for the name Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group.

     

    Ed Magedson, the owner of rip off report, allowed Ken White, lawyer with Brown, White and Newhouse and blogger at Popehat.com, to post defamatory comments about me, a very large post, which that part is fine by me, however Ed Magedson, unlike any other rip off report, put this on the very top of my Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group, rip off report. And Ed Magedson posted a First Amendment announcement within the top of the report, like NO OTHER rip off report ever.

     

    Then about 6 months after this, Ed Magedson removed the Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group from the entire report and claimed I had, after having been there for 2 years, somehow violated Ed Magedson's ripoff report rules and abused the website.  At this time he also posted that I, Crystal Cox had lost my Ninth Circuit appeal of which I won.

     

    Nevada attorney Marc Randazza wants Nevada Anti-Slapp laws to be how he co-wrote them so that he can get a lot more business, ok, fair enough on that. However, Marc Randazza uses those same laws to try and dismiss defamation and malpractice suits against him that REALLY are LEGIT.

     

    Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group, uses Nevada's Anti-SLAPP laws in which he co-wrote, in order to violate the rights of those who speak critical of him, he maliciously and deliberately defames and those who CLEARLY have violated their rights as  his former clients.

     

    And that is NOT fair, not Ethical and certainly not constitutional.

     

    Marc Randazza spoke out to STOP the billionaire founder of Wynn Resorts from what he claimed was “gutting” Nevada Anti-Slapp law that bar frivolous suits aimed at intimidating critics.

     

    Yet Marc Randazza has a pattern and history himself of filing frivolous legal action aimed at intimidating his critics. And not only intimidating them, but also bankrupting them, defaming them, putting massive fear and duress into them, threatening them, data mining their personal and private life, intimidating their church and friends, prying into their phone records and bank accounts, setting them up for felonies, and more.  All this to STOP his critics, instead of simply DOING A BETTER JOB and not violating the constitutional rights of his targets.

     

    "Marc Randazza, a Las Vegas First Amendment lawyer, called Wynn’s bill “an ignoble attempt to eviscerate” a law that was crucial to Nevada’s quest to attract media and technology firms."

    As seen in the article below.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-05-21/steve-wynn-s-slap-at-nevada-free-speech-law-draws-howl-from-yelp

     

    Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group RESPOND  to outspoken critics, like me, and Alexandra Mayers with a frivolous lawsuit, yet acts as if he is the good guy and Wynn’s bill “an ignoble attempt to eviscerate”.


    Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group ARE TRULY IGNOBLE, Hypocritical and dangerous.

     

    Anti-SLAPP statutes are important to protect free speech, because sometimes people sue just to silence their critics. That is very TRUE and Marc Randazza is one of those "people" who SUE TO silence, intimidate, bully and ruin the life of his critics.

     

    For More about Marc Randazza, the world's most hypcritical un-constitutional attorney

    http://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/

     

    Posted here by

    Reverend Crystal Cox

    Add your Story Add your Story