Bail Out
With all of the discussions about the Government bail out, who should get it, how much should they get, I have a stipulation I believe should have been placed on it. In order for a company to recieve money from the taxpayers here in the United States, they either can not have taken any of their plants outside of the United States or have a contingincy in place to bring them back in the next 2 years.
How are the taxpayers supposed to feel that we are bailing out companies like GM when they say that they are an American company and thet have taken more than half of their jobs over the border.
They want to make their product cheaper, charge the American people the same or more for it and all the while they are putting the ones who are supposed to afford these vehicles either out of work or into a less paying job.
I realize that they are a huge part of the economy here, I work for a transport company that transports the majority of their vehicles in the US, but sometimes you have to tell people to fix themselves especially when they are one of the major reasons this country is in the economic state they are in.
- TAGS:
What do you think of this story?
iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.


Comments