At approx. 4:15 p.m. March 28th in the city of Stockbridge GA, The people of Georgia returned an Indictment against Barack Hussein Obama!

Stockbridge, Georgia   The questions over the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to occupy his current position as President of the United States continue to be raised.

After being presented with evidence in the matter, a citizens' grand jury convened by Carl Swensson in Georgia has returned an indictment against Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro aka Barry Sutoro.

Reportedly the sealed indictment, scheduled to be delivered to prosecutors on Monday, includes counts of fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud.

"It's a done deal, and the people of the State of Georgia demand action on this matter," said Carl Swensson after the grand jury proceedings had finished. "I can't comment on this other than to say that the sealed indictment will be delivered to prosecutors on Monday."

"Obviously, where this goes remains to be seen, but it's one more sign that citizens are waking up and demanding that the allegations of fraud and forgery surrounding the eligibility of Obama be investigated.

EC interviews Carl Swensson on the common-law grand jury here:

Under the 5th Amendment to the Constitution, with the power confirmed and reinforced by the US Supreme Court, 'we the people' have the power to instigate criminal charges when it comes to government oversight.

Citizens sitting as Federal Grand Jurors are the fourth branch of the United States government. The Citizens of Georgia have proudly stood up to our corrupt officials and have exercised this right.

Obviously, where this goes remains to be seen. . ." The presentment as indictments are called in "Runaway" Juries may not go anywhere but must be answered by the attorneys general in 40 days.

http://www.dailypaul.com/node/88284

=========================================================

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html

''Of course, the grand jury's subpoena is not unlimited. It may consider incompetent evidence, but it may not itself violate a valid privilege, whether established by the Constitution, statutes, or the common law . . . . Although, for example, an indictment based on evidence obtained in violation of a defendant's Fifth Amendment privilege is nevertheless valid . . . , the grand jury may not force a witness to answer questions in violation of that constitutional guarantee. . . . Similarly, a grand jury may not compel a person to produce books and papers that would incriminate him. . . . The grand jury is also without power to invade a legitimate privacy interest protected by the Fourth Amendment. A grand jury's subpoena duces tecum will be disallowed if it is 'far too sweeping in its terms to be regarded as reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.'

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment05/01.html