Share this on:
 E-mail
67
VIEWS
 
RECOMMENDS
0
SHARES
About this iReport
  • Not vetted for CNN

  • Click to view alannsandieg's profile
    Posted November 2, 2009 by
    Location
    La Mesa, California
    Assignment
    Assignment
    This iReport is part of an assignment:
    Signs of the economic times

    More from alannsandieg

    War Costs 4 U

     

         I have not heard of taxes being raised, yet to pay for the Wars; and I believe you don't get something for nothing.

    =================================================================

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_cost_of_the_Iraq_War

    Indirect and delayed costs

    According to a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report published in October 2007, the U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan could cost taxpayers a total of $2.4 trillion dollars by 2017 when counting the huge interest costs because combat is being financed with borrowed money. The CBO estimated that of the $2.4 trillion long-term price tag for the war, about $1.9 trillion of that would be spent on Iraq.[9]

    Stiglitz, former chief economist of the World Bank and winner of the Nobel Prize in Economics, has stated the total costs of the Iraq War on the US economy will be three trillion dollars in a moderate scenario, and possibly more in the most recent published study, published in March 2008.[10] Stiglitz has stated: "The figure we arrive at is more than $3 trillion. Our calculations are based on conservative assumptions. They are conceptually simple, even if occasionally technically complicated. A $3 trillion figure for the total cost strikes us as judicious, and probably errs on the low side. Needless to say, this number represents the cost only to the United States. It does not reflect the enormous cost to the rest of the world, or to Iraq."[10]

    The CRS estimated in September 2006 that total expenditures had topped half a trillion dollars.[2] Additionally, the extended combat and equipment loss have placed a severe financial strain on the U.S Army, causing the elimination of non-essential expenses such as travel and civilian hiring.[11][12]

    As the total passed US$450 billion, the cost for the Iraq war reached approximately $1500 per person in the United States.[13] If the Iraq war were to wind up costing 1.9 trillion dollars, the cost would be over 4.2 times higher ($6,300 per United States citizen.) This would put the expense at $25,000 for an average family of four, or $32,000 per family if Afghanistan is included.

    As a comparison, with this money he estimates[13] that one could have built 8 million houses, paid 15 million teachers, paid for the child care of 530 million kids, paid for the scholarship of 43 million students, offered social safety net during 50 year to Americans. Stigltz also said that United States help for Africa is only $5 billion, soon to be superseded by China. $5 billions correspond to only the spending of 10 days for the war by the United States.

    The UH-60 Black Hawk that crashed on September 21, 2004.

    [edit] Long-term health care costs

    A recent study indicated that the long term health care costs for wounded Iraq war veterans could range from $350 billion to $700 billion.[14]

    [edit] Military equipment lost

    The U.S. has lost a number of pieces of military equipment during the war. The following statistics are from the Center for American Progress:[15]; they are approximations that include vehicles lost in non-combat-related accidents as of 2006.

    =========================================================================

    http://justthefacts.jottit.com/federal_budget

    September 22,  2008--Comparing Debt

    When Bill Clinton became president, the total federal debt, including both public debt and intragovernmental holdings, was $4.188 Trillion. When he left office, the debt was $5.728 Trillion. In other words, the federal debt, in nominal terms, climbed 26.88547%.

    Thus far (with about four months to go), the federal debt under W has grown from $5.728 Trillion to $9.727 Trillion or $3.999 Trillion. That's a 69.814944% increase, more than twice the percentage increase under Clinton.

    =========================================================================

    http://www.warresisters.org/pages/piechart.htm

    Current Military
    $965 billion:

    • Military Personnel $129 billion
    • Operation & Maint. $241 billion
    • Procurement $143 billion
    • Research & Dev. $79 billion
    • Construction $15 billion
    • Family Housing $3 billion
    • DoD misc. $4 billion
    • Retired Pay $70 billion
    • DoE nuclear weapons $17 billion
    • NASA (50%) $9 billion
    • International Security $9 billion
    • Homeland Secur. (military) $35 billion
    • State Dept. (partial) $6 billion
    • other military (non-DoD) $5 billion
    “Global War on Terror” $200 billion [We added $162 billion to   the last item to supplement the Budget’s grossly underestimated $38 billion   in “allowances” to be spent in 2009 for the “War on Terror,” which includes   the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan]

    Past Military,
    $484 billion:

    • Veterans’ Benefits   $94 billion
    • Interest on national debt (80%) created by military spending, $390 billion

    Human Resources
    $789 billion:

    • Health/Human Services
    • Soc. Sec. Administration
    • Education Dept.
    • Food/Nutrition programs
    • Housing & Urban Dev.
    • Labor Dept.
    • other human resources.

    General Government
    $304 billion:

    • Interest on debt (20%)
    • Treasury
    • Government personnel
    • Justice Dept.
    • State Dept.
    • Homeland Security (15%)
    • International Affairs
    • NASA (50%)
    • Judicial
    • Legislative
    • other general govt.

    Physical Resources
    $117 billion
    :
    • Agriculture
    • Interior
    • Transportation
    • Homeland Security (15%)
    • HUD
    • Commerce
    • Energy (non-military)
    • Environmental Protection

    • Nat. Science Fdtn.
    • Army Corps Engineers
    Fed. Comm. Commission
    • other physical   resources

    Total   Outlays (Federal Funds): $2,650 billion
    MILITARY: 54% and $1,449 billion
    NON-MILITARY: 46% and $1,210 billion

    HOW   THESE FIGURES WERE DETERMINED

    urrent military” includes   Dept. of Defense ($653 billion), the military portion from other departments   ($150 billion), and an additional $162 billion to supplement the Budget’s   misleading and vast underestimate of only $38 billion for the “war on   terror.” “Past military” represents veterans’ benefits plus 80% of the   interest on the debt.*

    The Government Deception

    The       pie chart below is the government view of the budget. This is a       distortion of how our income tax dollars are spent because it includes       Trust Funds (e.g., Social Security), and the expenses of past military       spending are not distinguished from nonmilitary spending. For a more       accurate representation of how your Federal income tax dollar is really spent,       see the large chart (top).

    Source: Congressional Budget Office for FY2008

    These figures   are from an analysis of detailed tables in the “Analytical Perspectives” book   of the Budget   of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2009. The figures are   federal funds, which do not include trust funds — such as Social Security —   that are raised and spent separately from income taxes. What you pay (or   don’t pay) by April 15,    2008, goes to the federal funds portion of the budget. The   government practice of combining trust and federal funds began during the   Vietnam War, thus making the human needs portion of the budget seem larger   and the military portion smaller.

    *Analysts   differ on how much of the debt stems from the military; other groups estimate   50% to 60%. We use 80% because we believe if there had been no military   spending most (if not all) of the national debt would have been eliminated.   For further explanation, please see box at bottom of page.

    Are We Safe Yet?

    Cost of the Iraqand AfghanistanWars
    (billions of       dollars)

    source:     For 2001 to 2008 from Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, armscontrolcenter.org; for 2009, the Budget includes $70     billion in “allowances” for GWOT; WRL estimates an additional $130 billion     will be authorized for spending in 2009 and subsequent years, making the     total authorized $200 billion. This graph shows Budget Authority, while the     pie on the front is Outlays.

    U.S.Military Spending vs. The World

    U.S. military spending – Dept. of     Defense plus nuclear weapons (in $billions) – is equal to the military     spending of the next 15 countries combined.

    These numbers show     military expenditures for each country. Some say that U.S. military spending will     naturally be higher because it has the highest Gross Domestic Product (GDP)     of any country. The United States accounts for 47 percent of the     world’s total military spending, however the U.S.’s share of the world's GDP is     about 21 percent. Also note that of the top 15 countries shown, at least 12     are considered allies of the U.S. The U.S. outspends Iran and North Korea by a ratio of 72 to one.

    Source: Center for     Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, http://old.armscontrolcenter.org/archives/002279.php;     our graph uses a more comparable figure of $515 from actual 2006 U.S. military spending

    Why Do the Percentages Vary from Group to     Group?

    The U.S. Government     says that military spending amounts to 20% of the budget, the Center     for Defense Information (CDI) reports 51%, the Friends Committee on National Legislation (FCNL) reports     43%, and the War Resisters League claims 54%. Why the variation?

    Different groups     have different purposes in how they present the budget figures.     WRL’s goal has been to show the percentage of money that goes to the     military (current and past) so that people paying — or not paying —     their federal taxes would know what portion of their payments are     military-oriented. Also, some of the numbers are for different fiscal     years.

    There are at least     five different factors to consider when analyzing the U.S. budget:

    • discretionary spending vs.          total spending
    • budget authority vs.          outlays
    • function vs.          agency/department
    • federal funds vs. unified          budget
    • time period

    Discretionary Spending. The Center     for Defense Information (CDI) has used "discretionary"     spending — budget items that Congress is allowed to tinker with — which     excludes so-called "mandatory" spending items (such as interest     on the national debt and retirement pay). WRL does not make such     distinctions and lumps them together.

    Past Military     Spending. If     the government does not have enough money to finance a war (or spending for     its hefty military budgets), they borrow through loans, savings bonds, and     so forth. This borrowing (done heavily during World War II and the Vietnam     War) comes back in later years as "hidden" military spending     through interest payments on the national debt.
             How much of the debt is considered     “military” varies from group. As mentioned above, WRL uses 80% whereas FCNL     uses 48%. Consequently, FCNL reports that 43% of the FY2007 budget is     military (29% current military and 14% past military). WRL's figures are     54% of the FY2009 budget (36% current — which includes 7% for
    Iraq & Afghanistan wars — and 18% past).

    Outlays vs.     Budget Authority. WRL uses "outlays" rather than "budget     authority," which is often preferred by the government, news media,     and groups such as CDI. Outlays refer to spending done in a particular     fiscal year, whereas budget authority refers to new spending     authorized over a period of several future years. Consequently, CDI     reported $421 billion in FY2005 budget authority for the military and     $2,200 billion "over the next five years." While WRL reports     outlays of $803 billion, plus an anticipated $162 billion in supplemental     spending requests for Iraq and Afghanistan wars, plus $484 billion in past     military spending — totaling $1,449 billion — just for FY2009.

    Function vs.     Agency/Department. Not all military spending is done by the Department of Defense. For     example, the Department of Energy is responsible for nuclear weapons.     Consequently, calculations of military spending should consider the function of the budget item regardless of the department or agency in charge of     it. However, not everyone agrees what constitutes a military function. For     example, WRL includes the 70% of Homeland Security (which includes the     Coast Guard), and half of NASA in military spending, while other groups do     not.

    Federal Funds vs.     Unified Budget. WRL     uses "federal funds" rather than the "unified budget"     figures that the government prefers. Federal funds exclude trust fund money     (e.g., social security), which is raised separately (e.g., the FICA and     Medicare deductions in paychecks) and is specifically ear-marked for     particular programs. By combining trust funds with federal funds, the     percentage of spending on the military appears smaller, a deceptive     practice first used by the government in the late 1960s as the Vietnam War     became more and more unpopular.

    What period are     we talking about? Finally, there is some variation in figures because different fiscal years     are used. WRL’s figures (above) are for FY2009 (Oct. 1,      2008 to Sep. 30, 2009) as are the most recent U.S. government figures. FCNL     sometimes does their analysis for the most recent completed year or FY2007 (Oct. 1, 2006 to Sep. 30, 2007).

    War Resisters League
    339 Lafayette Street
    New York, NY 10012
    (212) 228-0450
    fax (212) 228-6193
    wrl@warresisters.org
    WRL homepage


    Believing   war to be a crime against humanity, the War Resisters League, founded in   1923, advocates Gandhian nonviolence as the method for creating a democratic   society free of war, racism, sexism, and human exploitation.

    What do you think of this story?

    Select one of the options below. Your feedback will help tell CNN producers what to do with this iReport. If you'd like, you can explain your choice in the comments below.
    Be and editor! Choose an option below:
      Awesome! Put this on TV! Almost! Needs work. This submission violates iReport's community guidelines.

    Comments

    Log in to comment

    iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.

    Add your Story Add your Story