Share this on:
 E-mail
1,453
VIEWS
 
RECOMMENDS
3
SHARES
About this iReport
  • Approved for CNN

  • Click to view BarbRad's profile
    Posted November 14, 2009 by
    BarbRad
    Location
    Bella Vista, Arkansas
    Assignment
    Assignment
    This iReport is part of an assignment:
    iReport at the movies

    More from BarbRad

    2012: Good But Not Great

     

    CNN PRODUCER NOTE     BarbRad says she'd give '2012' between three-and-a-half and four stars. She was a big fan of the special effects, but says she would have cut the film to two hours.
    - rachel8, CNN iReport producer

    I've seen lots of disaster movies; I'm a disaster movie efficianado.  I know the plots, characters and cliches like the back of my hand...and 2012 included them all.  It also included scientific inprobabilities and inpossibilities.

     

    I don't care. 2012 was well written, well acted, and the special effects were outstanding.

     

    However, 2012 had one major problem that caused me to give it a lower rating than I might have: it was MUCH TOO LONG!  The director needs to recall the movie, recut it, and then send it out to the theaters once more.

    What do you think of this story?

    Select one of the options below. Your feedback will help tell CNN producers what to do with this iReport. If you'd like, you can explain your choice in the comments below.
    Be and editor! Choose an option below:
      Awesome! Put this on TV! Almost! Needs work. This submission violates iReport's community guidelines.

    Comments

    Log in to comment

    iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.

    Add your Story Add your Story