|
|
Posted January 8, 2010
by
|
Old Bridge, New Jersey
![]() |
This iReport is part of an assignment:
Response to terror incident: The right move? |
Why not use dogs at airports?
It would seem that instead of investing millions in full body scans that if each security line had a drug sniffing dog that would be more cost effective and work better. Even if you had to switch the dogs out every 2 hours, I have to think it would be less expensive
What do you think of this story?
iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.



Comments