|
|
Posted January 29, 2010
by
|
![]() |
This iReport is part of an assignment:
Ask Dr. Sanjay Gupta |
- DEC 14 2001 IRAN'S RAFSANJANI SAYS MUSLIMS SHOULD USE NUCLEAR WEAPON AGAINST ISRAEL
- !!HEY ANDERSON!! CNN TRUTH SQUAD BLOWS IT. DEC 14 2001 IRAN THREATENED TO USE AN ATOMIC WEAPON AGAINST ISRAEL WHEN THEY POSSESSED ONE
- WHY DOES THE 7 BILLION DOLLAR KEYSTONE PIPELINE HAVE TO BE BUILT WITH TAXPAYER MONEY??
- AMERICA UNDER ATTACK FROM ITS OWN STUPIDITY
- MASSIVE GROWTH IN CHINESE MILITARY TO BE MET WITH MASSIVE US MILITARY CUTS TO KEEP TAXES LOW FOR THE WEALTHY???
NIH LISTS STUDY LINKING BRAIN CELL DAMAGE TO GSM MOBILE PHONE RADIATION
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1241519/pdf/ehp0111-000881.pdf
Research Article Research Article
Nerve Cell Damage in Mammalian Brain after Exposure to Microwaves from
GSM Mobile Phones
Leif G. Salford,1 Arne E. Brun,2 Jacob L. Eberhardt,3 Lars Malmgren,4 and Bertil R. R. Persson3
1Department of Neurosurgery, 2Department of Neuropathology, 3Department of Medical Radiation Physics, and 4Department of Applied
Electronics, Lund University, The Rausing Laboratory and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
The possible risks of radio-frequency electromagnetic fields for the human body is a growing concern
for our society. We have previously shown that weak pulsed microwaves give rise to a significant
leakage of albumin through the blood–brain barrier. In this study we investigated whether a
pathologic leakage across the blood–brain barrier might be combined with damage to the neurons.
Three groups each of eight rats were exposed for 2 hr to Global System for Mobile
Communications (GSM) mobile phone electromagnetic fields of different strengths. We found
highly significant (p < 0.002) evidence for neuronal damage in the cortex, hippocampus, and basal
ganglia in the brains of exposed rats. Key words: blood–brain barrier, central nervous system,
microwaves, mobile phones, neuronal damage, rats. Environ Health Perspect 111:881–883 (2003).
doi:10.1289/ehp.6039 available via http://dx.doi.org/ [Online 29 January 2003]
The voluntary exposure of the brain to
microwaves from hand-held mobile phones
by one-fourth of the world’s population has
been called the largest human biologic experiment
ever (Salford et al. 2001). In the near
future, microwaves will also be emitted by an
abundance of other appliances in the cordless
office and also in the home. The possible risks
of radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (RF
EMFs) for the human body is a growing concern
for our society (for a review, see Hyland
2000). Most researchers in the field have
dwelled on the question of whether RF EMFs
may induce or promote cancer growth.
Although some have indicated increased risk
(Hardell et al. 2002; Repacholi et al. 1997),
most studies, including our own, have shown
no effects (Salford et al. 1997a) or even a
decreased risk (Adey et al. 1999).
The possible risks of microwaves for the
human body has attracted interest since the
1960s (i.e., before the advent of mobile
phones), when radar and microwave ovens
posed a possible health problem. Oscar and
Hawkins (1977) performed early studies on
effects of RF EMFs on the blood–brain barrier.
They demonstrated that at very low
energy levels (< 10 W/m2), the fields in a
restricted exposure window caused a significant
leakage of 14C-mannitol, inulin, and also
dextran (same molecular weight as albumin)
from the capillaries into the surrounding
cerebellar brain tissue. These findings, however,
were not repeated in a study using 14Csucrose
(Gruenau et al. 1982). A recent in
vitro study has shown that EMF at 1.8 GHz
increase the permeability of the blood–brain
barrier to sucrose (Schirmacher et al. 2000).
Shivers and colleagues (Shivers et al. 1987;
Prato et al. 1990) examined the effect of magnetic
resonance imaging upon the rat brain.
They showed that the combined exposure to
RF EMFs and pulsed and static magnetic
fields gave rise to a significant pinocytotic
transport of albumin from the capillaries into
the brain.
Inspired by this work, since 1988 our
group has studied the effects of different intensities
and modulations of 915 MHz RF EMFs
in a rat model where the exposure takes place
in a transverse electromagnetic transmission
line chamber (TEM-cell) during various time
periods. In series of more than 1,600 animals,
we have proven that subthermal power densities
from both pulse-modulated and continuous
RF EMFs—including those from GSM
(Global System for Mobile Communications)
mobile phones—have the potency to significantly
open the blood–brain barrier such that
the animals’ own albumin (but not fibrinogen)
passes out of the bloodstream into the brain
tissue and accumulates in the neurons and glial
cells surrounding the capillaries (Malmgren
1998; Persson et al. 1997; Persson and Salford
1996; Salford et al. 1992, 1993, 1994, 1997b,
2001) (Figure 1). These results have been
duplicated recently in another laboratory (Töre
et al. 2001). Similar results have been reported
by others (Fritze et al. 1997).
We and others (Oscar and Hawkins
1977; Persson et al. 1997) have pointed out
that when such a relatively large molecule as
albumin can pass the blood–brain barrier, so
too can many other smaller molecules,
including toxic ones, which may escape into
the brain because of exposure to RF EMFs.
We have hitherto not concluded that such
leakage is harmful for the brain. However,
Hassel et al. (1994) have shown that autologous
albumin injected into the brain tissue of
rats leads to damage to neurons at the injection
site when the concentration of albumin
in the injected solution is at least 25% of that
in blood. In the present study, we investigated
whether leakage across the blood–brain
barrier might cause damage to the neurons.
Materials and Methods
TEM-cells used for the RF EMF exposure of
rats were designed by dimensional scaling from
previously constructed cells at the National
Bureau of Standards (Crawford 1974). TEM-
cells are known to generate uniform electromagnetic
fields for standard measurements. A
genuine GSM mobile phone with a programmable
power output was connected via a coaxial
cable to the TEM-cell; no voice modulation
was applied.
The TEM-cell is enclosed in a wooden
box (15 × 15 × 15 cm) that supports the outer
conductor and central plate. The outer conductor
is made of brass net and is attached to
the inner walls of the box. The center plate, or
septum, is constructed of aluminum.
The TEM-cells were placed in a temperature-
controlled room, and the temperature in
the TEM-cells was kept constant by circulating
room air through holes in the wooden box.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) distribution
in the rat brain has been simulated with
the finite-difference time-domain method
(Martens et al. 1993) and found to vary < 6 dB
in the rat brain.
The rats were placed in plastic trays (12 ×
12 × 7 cm) to avoid contact with the central
plate and outer conductor. The bottom of the
tray was covered with absorbing paper to collect
urine and feces.
Thirty-two male and female Fischer 344
rats 12–26 weeks of age and weighing 282 ±
91 g were divided into four groups of eight
rats each. The peak output power of 10 mW,
100 mW, and 1,000 mW per cell from the
GSM mobile telephone was fed into two
TEM-cells simultaneously for 2 hr. This
exposed the rats to peak power densities of
0.24. 2.4, and 24 W/m2, respectively. This
exposure resulted in average whole-body
SARs of 2 mW/kg, 20 mW/kg, and 200
mW/kg, respectively. For further details about
exposure conditions and SAR calculations, see
Martens et al. (1993) and Malmgren (1998).
The fourth group of rats was simultaneously
Address correspondence to L.G. Salford, Dept. of
Neurosurgery, Lund University Hospital, S-221 85
Lund, Sweden. Telephone: 46-46-171270. Fax: 4646-
188150. E-mail: Leif.Salford@neurokir.lu.se
We thank S. Strömblad and C. Blennow at the
Rausing Laboratory for excellent technical assistance.
The work was supported by a grant from the
Swedish Council for Work Life Research.
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
Received 4 October 2002; accepted 28 January 2003.
Environmental Health Perspectives • VOLUME 111 | NUMBER 7 | June 2003
Article | Salford et al.
kept for 2 hr in nonactivated TEM-cells. The
animals were awake during the exposure and
could move and turn within the exposure
chamber.
The animals in each exposure group were
allowed to survive for about 50 days after
exposure. They were carefully observed daily
for neurologic and behavioral abnormalities
during this period, at the end of which they
were anesthetized and sacrificed by perfusion
fixation with 4% formaldehyde.
The brains were removed from the skull
by nontraumatic technique (resection of bone
structures at the skull base, followed by a
midline incision from the foramen magnum
to the nose) after an extended in situ postmortem
fixation time of 30 min. Each brain
was sectioned coronally in 1–2-mm-thick
slices, which all were embedded in paraffin,
cut in 5-µm sections, and stained for
RNA/DNA with cresyl violet to show dark
neurons. Applying albumin antibodies
(Dakocytomation Norden AB, Älvsjö,
Sweden) reveals albumin as brownish spotty
or more diffuse discolorations (Salford et al.
1994).
The occurrence of “dark neurons” was
judged semiquantitatively by the neuropathologist
as 0 (no or occasional dark neurons), 1
(moderate occurrence of dark neurons), or 2
(abundant occurrence). The microscopic
analysis was performed blind to the test situation.
The Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of
variance by ranks was used for a simultaneous
statistical test of the score distributions for the
four exposure conditions. When the null
hypothesis could be rejected, comparisons
between controls and each of the exposure
conditions was made with the Mann-Whitney
nonparametric test for independent samples.
Results and Discussion
Controls and test animals alike showed the
normal diffuse positive immunostaining for
albumin in hypothalamus, a kind of built-in
method control.
Control animals showed either no positivity
or an occasional and often questionable
positivity for albumin outside the hypothalamus
(Figure 1A). In one control animal we
observed a moderate number of dark neurons,
but no such change was observed in all the
other controls.
Exposed animals usually showed several
albumin-positive foci around the finer blood
vessels in white and gray matter (Figure 1B).
Here the albumin had spread in the tissue
between the cell bodies and surrounded neurons,
which either contained no albumin or
contained albumin in some foci. Scattered
neurons, not associated with albumin leakage
between the neurons, were also positive.
The cresyl violet staining revealed scattered
and grouped dark neurons, which were
often shrunken and darkly stained, homogenized
with loss of discernible internal cell
structures. Some of these dark neurons were
also albumin positive or showed cytoplasmic
microvacuoles indicating an active pathologic
process. There were no hemorrhages
and no discernible glial reaction, astrocytic
or microglial, adjacent to changed neurons.
Changed neurons were seen in all locations,
but especially the cortex, hippocampus, and
basal ganglia, mixed in among normal neurons
(Figure 2). The percentage abnormal
neurons is roughly appreciated to be maximally
around 2%, but in some restricted areas
they dominated the picture.
The occurrence of dark neurons under the
different exposure conditions is presented in
Figure 3, which shows a significant positive
relation between EMF dosage (SAR) and
number of dark neurons.
A combined nonparametric test for the
four exposure situations simultaneously
revealed that the distributions of scores differed
significantly between the groups (p < 0.002).
We present here for the first time evidence
for neuronal damage caused by nonthermal
microwave exposure. The cortex as well as the
hippocampus and the basal ganglia in the
brains of exposed rats contained damaged neurons.
We realize that our study comprises few
animals, but the combined results are highly
significant and exhibit a clear dose–response
relation.
We considered the observed dark neurons
not to be artifacts for the following reasons:
first, the brains were removed atraumatically
and perfusion fixed in situ; second, the dark
Figure 1. Cross-section of central parts of the brain of (A) an unexposed control rat and (B) an RF EMF-
exposed rat, both stained for albumin, which appears brown. In (A), albumin is visible in the central inferior
parts of the brain (the hypothalamus), which is a normal feature. In (B), albumin is visible in multiple small
foci representing leakage from many vessels. Magnification, about ×3.
Score for occurrence of dark neurons
2 24 5
0 2 20 200
SAR (mW/kg)
1 1 2 42
.
.
0 74 1
Figure 2. Photomicrograph of sections of brain from an RF EMF-exposed rat stained with cresyl violet. (A)
Row of nerve cells in a section of the pyramidal cell band of the hippocampus; among the normal nerve
cells (large cells) are interspersed black and shrunken nerve cells, so-called dark neurons. (B) The cortex,
top left, of an RF EMF-exposed rat showing normal nerve cells (pale blue) intermingled with abnormal,
black and shrunken “dark neurons” at all depths of the cortex, but least in the superficial upper layers.
Magnification, ×160.
Figure 3. Distribution of scores for the occurrence
of “dark neurons” as a function of exposure condition.
The dashed line connects mean values for
each condition. Numbers in the figure indicate the
number of animals in the treatment group with that
score. A simultaneous nonparametric comparison
of all four conditions revealed significant differences
(p < 0.002). As compared to control, p < 0.2
for 2 mW/kg; p = 0.01 for 20 mW/kg; and p = 0.03 for
200 mW/kg.
VOLUME 111 | NUMBER 7 | June 2003 • Environmental Health Perspectives
Article | Nerve cell damage from GSM mobile phones
neurons were intermingled with normal-
appearing neurons (see Figure 2). Also, the
presence of vacuoles in several of the dark
neurons is a clear sign that damage occurred
in the living animal. We cannot exclude that
the neuronal change described may represent
apoptotic cell death.
The neuronal albumin uptake and other
changes described would seem to indicate serious
neuronal damage, which may be mediated
through organelle damage with release of not
only hydrolytic lysosomal enzymes but also, for
example, sequestered harmful material, such as
heavy metals, stored away in cytoplasmic
organelles (lysosomes).
The time between last exposure and sacrifice
is of great importance for the detection of
foci of leakage because extravasated albumin
rapidly diffuses down to, and beyond, concentrations
possible to demonstrate accurately
immunohistologically. However, the initial
albumin leakage into the brain tissue (seen
within hours in ~40% of exposed animals in
our previous studies) may start a secondary
blood–brain barrier opening, leading to a
vicious circle—because we demonstrate albumin
leakage even 8 weeks after the exposure.
We chose 12–26-week-old rats because
they are comparable with human teenagers—
notably frequent users of mobile phones—with
respect to age. The situation of the growing
brain might deserve special concern from society
because biologic and maturational
processes are particularly vulnerable during the
growth process. The intense use of mobile
phones by youngsters is a serious consideration.
A neuronal damage of the kind described
here may not have immediately demonstrable
consequences, even if repeated. In the long
run, however, it may result in reduced brain
reserve capacity that might be unveiled by
other later neuronal disease or even the wear
and tear of aging. We cannot exclude that
after some decades of (often) daily use, a
whole generation of users may suffer negative
effects, perhaps as early as in middle age.
Correction
Figure 1 in the original manuscript was
cited in “Materials and Methods” and
illustrated albumin leakage that we had
reported earlier. The figure showed
examples of cross-sections of the brains
of rats sacrificed immediately after exposure
to microwaves. Because this could
be misunderstood, in the interest of
clarity and with the permission of the
editor, we have replaced that figure.
The new Figure 1 is now cited in
“Results” and shows animals from the
present study. Figure 1A illustrates the
brain of a sham-exposed control animal,
and Figure 1B illustrates an animal
exposed to 2 mW/kg for 2 hr.
REFERENCES
Adey W, Byus C, Cain C, Higgins R, Jones R, Kean C, et al. 1999.
Spontaneous and nitrosourea-induced primary tumors of
the central nervous system in Fisher 344 rats exposed to
836 MHz modulated microwaves. Radiat Res 152:293–302.
Crawford M. 1974. Generation of standard EM field using TEM
transmission cells. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat EMC
16:189–195.
Fritze K, Sommer C, Schmitz B, Mies G, Hossman K, Kiessling M,
et al. 1997. Effect of global system for mobile communication
(GSM) microwave exposure on blood-brain barrier
permeability in rat. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 94:465–470.
Gruenau SP, Oscar KJ, Folker MT, Rapoport SI. 1982. Absence
of microwave effect on blood-brain-barrier permeability to
[C-14]-labeled sucrose in the conscious rat. Exp Neurol
75:299–307.
Hardell L, Hallquist A, Hansson Mild K, Carlberg M, Påhlson A,
et al. 2002. Cellular and cordless telephones and the risk
for brain tumours. Eur J Cancer Prev 11:377–386.
Hassel B, Iversen E, Fonnum F. 1994. Neurotoxicity of albumin
in-vivo. Neurosci Lett 167:29–32.
Hyland G. 2000. Physics and biology of mobile telephony. Lancet
356:1833–1836.
Malmgren L. 1998. Radio Frequency Systems for NMR Imaging:
Coil Development and Studies of Non-Thermal Biological
Effects [PhD thesis]. Lund, Sweden:Department of Applied
Electronics, Lund University.
Martens L, Van Hese J, De Sutter D, De Wagter C, Malmgren L,
Persson BRR, et al. 1993. Electromagnetic field calculations
used for exposure experiments on small animals in
TEM-cells. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 30:73–81
Oscar K, Hawkins T. 1977. Microwave alteration of the blood-
brain barrier system of rats. Brain Res 126:281–293.
Persson B, Salford L. 1996. Permeability of the blood-brain barrier
in rats induced by continuous wave and pulse-modulated
915 MHz electromagnetic radiation exposure in
TEM-cells. In: Proceedings of the COST 244 Workshop,
Kuopio Finland, 3–4 September 1995 (Chiabrera A,
Juutilainen J, eds). EU DG XIII. Brussels:COST 244, 66–72.
Persson B, Salford L, Brun A. 1997. Blood-brain barrier permeability
in rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in
wireless communication. Wireless Networks 3:455–461.
Prato F, Frappier J, Shivers R, Kavaliers M, Zabel P, Drost D, et
al. 1990. Magnetic resonance imaging increases the blood-
brain barrier permeability to 153-gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic
acid in rats. Brain Res 523:301–304.
Repacholi M, Basten A, Gebski V, Noonan D, Finnie J, Harris A.
1997. Lymphomas in Eµ-Pim1 transgenic mice exposed to
pulsed 900 MHz electromagnetic fields. Radiat Res
147:631–640.
Salford LG, Brun A, Eberhardt J, Malmgren L, Persson B. 1992.
Electromagnetic field-induced permeability of the blood-
brain barrier shown by immunohistochemical methods. In:
Interaction Mechanism of Low-Level Electromagnetic
Fields in Living Systems (Nordén B, Ramel C, eds). Oxford,
UK:Oxford University Press, 251–258.
Salford LG, Brun A, Eberhardt J, Persson B. 1993. Permeability
of the blood-brain barrier induced by 915 MHz electromagnetic
radiation, continuous wave and modulated at 8, 16,
50, 200 Hz. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 30:293–301.
Salford LG, Brun A, Persson B. 1997a. Brain tumour development
in rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in
wireless communication. Wireless Networks 3:463–469.
Salford LG, Brun A, Sturesson K, Eberhardt J, Persson B. 1994.
Permeability of the blood-brain barrier induced by 915 MHz
electromagnetic radiation, continuous wave and modulated
at 8, 16, 50, and 200 Hz. Microsc Res Techn 27:535–542.
Salford LG, Persson B, Brun A. 1997b. Neurological aspects on
wireless communication. In: Non-Thermal Effects of RF
Electromagnetic Fields (Bernhardt JH, Matthes R, Repacholi
MH, eds). Munich, Germany:International Commission on
Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, 131–143.
Salford LG, Persson B, Malmgren L, Brun A. 2001. Téléphonie
mobile et barrière sang-cerveau. In: Téléphonie Mobile—
Effets Potentiels sur la Santé des Ondes Électromagnétiques
de Haute Fréquence (Pietteur Marco, ed). Embourg,
Belgium:Collection Resurgence, 141–152.
Schirmacher A, Winters S, Fischer S, Goeke J, Galla HJ,
Kullnick U, et al. 2000. Electromagnetic fields (1.8 GHz)
increase the permeability to sucrose of the blood-brain
barrier in vitro. Bioelectromagnetics 21:338–345.
Shivers R, Kavaliers M, Teskey G, Prato F, Pelletier R. 1987.
Magnetic resonance imaging temporarily alters blood-
brain barrier in the rat. Neurosci Lett 76:25–31.
Töre F, Dulou P-E, Haro E, Veyret B, Aubineau P. 2001. Two-hour
exposure to 2 W/kg, 900 MHz GSM microwaves induces
plasma protein extravasation in rat brain. In: Proceedings
from the 5th International Congress of the European
Bioelectromagnetics Association, 6 September 2001,
Helsinki, Finland (Hietanen M, Jokela K, Juutilainen, J, eds).
Helsinki:Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 43–45.
Environmental Health Perspectives • VOLUME 111 | NUMBER 7 | June 2003
What do you think of this story?
iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.



Comments