Share this on:
 E-mail
83
VIEWS
 
RECOMMENDS
2
SHARES
About this iReport
  • Not vetted for CNN

  • Click to view BruceRubin's profile
    Posted January 29, 2010 by
    Assignment
    Assignment
    This iReport is part of an assignment:
    Ask Dr. Sanjay Gupta

    More from BruceRubin

    NIH LISTS STUDY LINKING BRAIN CELL DAMAGE TO GSM MOBILE PHONE RADIATION

     

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1241519/pdf/ehp0111-000881.pdf

     

    Research Article Research Article

    Nerve Cell Damage in Mammalian Brain after Exposure to Microwaves from

    GSM Mobile Phones

     

    Leif G. Salford,1 Arne E. Brun,2 Jacob L. Eberhardt,3 Lars Malmgren,4 and Bertil R. R. Persson3

     

    1Department of Neurosurgery, 2Department of Neuropathology, 3Department of Medical Radiation Physics, and 4Department of Applied

    Electronics, Lund University, The Rausing Laboratory and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden

     

    The possible risks of radio-frequency electromagnetic fields for the human body is a growing concern

    for our society. We have previously shown that weak pulsed microwaves give rise to a significant

    leakage of albumin through the blood–brain barrier. In this study we investigated whether a

    pathologic leakage across the blood–brain barrier might be combined with damage to the neurons.

    Three groups each of eight rats were exposed for 2 hr to Global System for Mobile

    Communications (GSM) mobile phone electromagnetic fields of different strengths. We found

    highly significant (p < 0.002) evidence for neuronal damage in the cortex, hippocampus, and basal

    ganglia in the brains of exposed rats. Key words: blood–brain barrier, central nervous system,

    microwaves, mobile phones, neuronal damage, rats. Environ Health Perspect 111:881–883 (2003).

    doi:10.1289/ehp.6039 available via http://dx.doi.org/ [Online 29 January 2003]

     

    The voluntary exposure of the brain to

    microwaves from hand-held mobile phones

    by one-fourth of the world’s population has

    been called the largest human biologic experiment

    ever (Salford et al. 2001). In the near

    future, microwaves will also be emitted by an

    abundance of other appliances in the cordless

    office and also in the home. The possible risks

    of radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (RF

    EMFs) for the human body is a growing concern

    for our society (for a review, see Hyland

    2000). Most researchers in the field have

    dwelled on the question of whether RF EMFs

    may induce or promote cancer growth.

    Although some have indicated increased risk

    (Hardell et al. 2002; Repacholi et al. 1997),

    most studies, including our own, have shown

    no effects (Salford et al. 1997a) or even a

    decreased risk (Adey et al. 1999).

     

    The possible risks of microwaves for the

    human body has attracted interest since the

    1960s (i.e., before the advent of mobile

    phones), when radar and microwave ovens

    posed a possible health problem. Oscar and

    Hawkins (1977) performed early studies on

    effects of RF EMFs on the blood–brain barrier.

    They demonstrated that at very low

    energy levels (< 10 W/m2), the fields in a

    restricted exposure window caused a significant

    leakage of 14C-mannitol, inulin, and also

    dextran (same molecular weight as albumin)

    from the capillaries into the surrounding

    cerebellar brain tissue. These findings, however,

    were not repeated in a study using 14Csucrose

    (Gruenau et al. 1982). A recent in

    vitro study has shown that EMF at 1.8 GHz

    increase the permeability of the blood–brain

    barrier to sucrose (Schirmacher et al. 2000).

    Shivers and colleagues (Shivers et al. 1987;

    Prato et al. 1990) examined the effect of magnetic

    resonance imaging upon the rat brain.

    They showed that the combined exposure to

    RF EMFs and pulsed and static magnetic

     

    fields gave rise to a significant pinocytotic

    transport of albumin from the capillaries into

    the brain.

     

    Inspired by this work, since 1988 our

    group has studied the effects of different intensities

    and modulations of 915 MHz RF EMFs

    in a rat model where the exposure takes place

    in a transverse electromagnetic transmission

    line chamber (TEM-cell) during various time

    periods. In series of more than 1,600 animals,

    we have proven that subthermal power densities

    from both pulse-modulated and continuous

    RF EMFs—including those from GSM

    (Global System for Mobile Communications)

    mobile phones—have the potency to significantly

    open the blood–brain barrier such that

    the animals’ own albumin (but not fibrinogen)

    passes out of the bloodstream into the brain

    tissue and accumulates in the neurons and glial

    cells surrounding the capillaries (Malmgren

    1998; Persson et al. 1997; Persson and Salford

    1996; Salford et al. 1992, 1993, 1994, 1997b,

    2001) (Figure 1). These results have been

    duplicated recently in another laboratory (Töre

    et al. 2001). Similar results have been reported

    by others (Fritze et al. 1997).

     

    We and others (Oscar and Hawkins

    1977; Persson et al. 1997) have pointed out

    that when such a relatively large molecule as

    albumin can pass the blood–brain barrier, so

    too can many other smaller molecules,

    including toxic ones, which may escape into

    the brain because of exposure to RF EMFs.

    We have hitherto not concluded that such

    leakage is harmful for the brain. However,

    Hassel et al. (1994) have shown that autologous

    albumin injected into the brain tissue of

    rats leads to damage to neurons at the injection

    site when the concentration of albumin

    in the injected solution is at least 25% of that

    in blood. In the present study, we investigated

    whether leakage across the blood–brain

    barrier might cause damage to the neurons.

     

    Materials and Methods

     

    TEM-cells used for the RF EMF exposure of

    rats were designed by dimensional scaling from

    previously constructed cells at the National

    Bureau of Standards (Crawford 1974). TEM-

    cells are known to generate uniform electromagnetic

    fields for standard measurements. A

    genuine GSM mobile phone with a programmable

    power output was connected via a coaxial

    cable to the TEM-cell; no voice modulation

    was applied.

     

    The TEM-cell is enclosed in a wooden

    box (15 × 15 × 15 cm) that supports the outer

    conductor and central plate. The outer conductor

    is made of brass net and is attached to

    the inner walls of the box. The center plate, or

    septum, is constructed of aluminum.

     

    The TEM-cells were placed in a temperature-

    controlled room, and the temperature in

    the TEM-cells was kept constant by circulating

    room air through holes in the wooden box.

     

    The specific absorption rate (SAR) distribution

    in the rat brain has been simulated with

    the finite-difference time-domain method

    (Martens et al. 1993) and found to vary < 6 dB

    in the rat brain.

     

    The rats were placed in plastic trays (12 ×

    12 × 7 cm) to avoid contact with the central

    plate and outer conductor. The bottom of the

    tray was covered with absorbing paper to collect

    urine and feces.

     

    Thirty-two male and female Fischer 344

    rats 12–26 weeks of age and weighing 282 ±

    91 g were divided into four groups of eight

    rats each. The peak output power of 10 mW,

    100 mW, and 1,000 mW per cell from the

    GSM mobile telephone was fed into two

    TEM-cells simultaneously for 2 hr. This

    exposed the rats to peak power densities of

     

    0.24. 2.4, and 24 W/m2, respectively. This

    exposure resulted in average whole-body

    SARs of 2 mW/kg, 20 mW/kg, and 200

    mW/kg, respectively. For further details about

    exposure conditions and SAR calculations, see

    Martens et al. (1993) and Malmgren (1998).

    The fourth group of rats was simultaneously

    Address correspondence to L.G. Salford, Dept. of

    Neurosurgery, Lund University Hospital, S-221 85

    Lund, Sweden. Telephone: 46-46-171270. Fax: 4646-

    188150. E-mail: Leif.Salford@neurokir.lu.se

     

    We thank S. Strömblad and C. Blennow at the

    Rausing Laboratory for excellent technical assistance.

     

    The work was supported by a grant from the

    Swedish Council for Work Life Research.

     

    The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

     

    Received 4 October 2002; accepted 28 January 2003.

     

    Environmental Health Perspectives • VOLUME 111 | NUMBER 7 | June 2003

     

     

    Article | Salford et al.

     

    kept for 2 hr in nonactivated TEM-cells. The

    animals were awake during the exposure and

    could move and turn within the exposure

    chamber.

     

    The animals in each exposure group were

    allowed to survive for about 50 days after

    exposure. They were carefully observed daily

    for neurologic and behavioral abnormalities

    during this period, at the end of which they

    were anesthetized and sacrificed by perfusion

    fixation with 4% formaldehyde.

     

    The brains were removed from the skull

    by nontraumatic technique (resection of bone

    structures at the skull base, followed by a

    midline incision from the foramen magnum

    to the nose) after an extended in situ postmortem

    fixation time of 30 min. Each brain

    was sectioned coronally in 1–2-mm-thick

    slices, which all were embedded in paraffin,

    cut in 5-µm sections, and stained for

    RNA/DNA with cresyl violet to show dark

    neurons. Applying albumin antibodies

    (Dakocytomation Norden AB, Älvsjö,

    Sweden) reveals albumin as brownish spotty

    or more diffuse discolorations (Salford et al.

    1994).

     

    The occurrence of “dark neurons” was

    judged semiquantitatively by the neuropathologist

    as 0 (no or occasional dark neurons), 1

    (moderate occurrence of dark neurons), or 2

     

    (abundant occurrence). The microscopic

    analysis was performed blind to the test situation.

    The Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of

    variance by ranks was used for a simultaneous

    statistical test of the score distributions for the

    four exposure conditions. When the null

    hypothesis could be rejected, comparisons

    between controls and each of the exposure

    conditions was made with the Mann-Whitney

    nonparametric test for independent samples.

     

    Results and Discussion

     

    Controls and test animals alike showed the

    normal diffuse positive immunostaining for

    albumin in hypothalamus, a kind of built-in

    method control.

     

    Control animals showed either no positivity

    or an occasional and often questionable

    positivity for albumin outside the hypothalamus

    (Figure 1A). In one control animal we

    observed a moderate number of dark neurons,

    but no such change was observed in all the

    other controls.

     

    Exposed animals usually showed several

    albumin-positive foci around the finer blood

    vessels in white and gray matter (Figure 1B).

    Here the albumin had spread in the tissue

    between the cell bodies and surrounded neurons,

    which either contained no albumin or

    contained albumin in some foci. Scattered

     

     

    neurons, not associated with albumin leakage

    between the neurons, were also positive.

     

    The cresyl violet staining revealed scattered

    and grouped dark neurons, which were

    often shrunken and darkly stained, homogenized

    with loss of discernible internal cell

    structures. Some of these dark neurons were

    also albumin positive or showed cytoplasmic

    microvacuoles indicating an active pathologic

    process. There were no hemorrhages

    and no discernible glial reaction, astrocytic

    or microglial, adjacent to changed neurons.

    Changed neurons were seen in all locations,

    but especially the cortex, hippocampus, and

    basal ganglia, mixed in among normal neurons

    (Figure 2). The percentage abnormal

    neurons is roughly appreciated to be maximally

    around 2%, but in some restricted areas

    they dominated the picture.

     

    The occurrence of dark neurons under the

    different exposure conditions is presented in

    Figure 3, which shows a significant positive

    relation between EMF dosage (SAR) and

    number of dark neurons.

     

    A combined nonparametric test for the

    four exposure situations simultaneously

    revealed that the distributions of scores differed

    significantly between the groups (p < 0.002).

     

    We present here for the first time evidence

    for neuronal damage caused by nonthermal

    microwave exposure. The cortex as well as the

    hippocampus and the basal ganglia in the

    brains of exposed rats contained damaged neurons.

    We realize that our study comprises few

    animals, but the combined results are highly

    significant and exhibit a clear dose–response

    relation.

     

    We considered the observed dark neurons

    not to be artifacts for the following reasons:

    first, the brains were removed atraumatically

    and perfusion fixed in situ; second, the dark

     

    Figure 1. Cross-section of central parts of the brain of (A) an unexposed control rat and (B) an RF EMF-

     

    exposed rat, both stained for albumin, which appears brown. In (A), albumin is visible in the central inferior

    parts of the brain (the hypothalamus), which is a normal feature. In (B), albumin is visible in multiple small

     

    foci representing leakage from many vessels. Magnification, about ×3.

     

     

    Score for occurrence of dark neurons

     

    2 24 5

     

    0 2 20 200

    SAR (mW/kg)

    1 1 2 42

     

    .

     

    .

     

    0 74 1

     

    Figure 2. Photomicrograph of sections of brain from an RF EMF-exposed rat stained with cresyl violet. (A)

    Row of nerve cells in a section of the pyramidal cell band of the hippocampus; among the normal nerve

    cells (large cells) are interspersed black and shrunken nerve cells, so-called dark neurons. (B) The cortex,

    top left, of an RF EMF-exposed rat showing normal nerve cells (pale blue) intermingled with abnormal,

    black and shrunken “dark neurons” at all depths of the cortex, but least in the superficial upper layers.

    Magnification, ×160.

     

    Figure 3. Distribution of scores for the occurrence

    of “dark neurons” as a function of exposure condition.

    The dashed line connects mean values for

    each condition. Numbers in the figure indicate the

    number of animals in the treatment group with that

    score. A simultaneous nonparametric comparison

    of all four conditions revealed significant differences

    (p < 0.002). As compared to control, p < 0.2

    for 2 mW/kg; p = 0.01 for 20 mW/kg; and p = 0.03 for

    200 mW/kg.

     

    VOLUME 111 | NUMBER 7 | June 2003 • Environmental Health Perspectives

     

     

    Article | Nerve cell damage from GSM mobile phones

     

    neurons were intermingled with normal-

    appearing neurons (see Figure 2). Also, the

    presence of vacuoles in several of the dark

    neurons is a clear sign that damage occurred

    in the living animal. We cannot exclude that

    the neuronal change described may represent

    apoptotic cell death.

     

    The neuronal albumin uptake and other

    changes described would seem to indicate serious

    neuronal damage, which may be mediated

    through organelle damage with release of not

    only hydrolytic lysosomal enzymes but also, for

    example, sequestered harmful material, such as

    heavy metals, stored away in cytoplasmic

    organelles (lysosomes).

     

    The time between last exposure and sacrifice

    is of great importance for the detection of

    foci of leakage because extravasated albumin

    rapidly diffuses down to, and beyond, concentrations

    possible to demonstrate accurately

    immunohistologically. However, the initial

    albumin leakage into the brain tissue (seen

    within hours in ~40% of exposed animals in

    our previous studies) may start a secondary

    blood–brain barrier opening, leading to a

    vicious circle—because we demonstrate albumin

    leakage even 8 weeks after the exposure.

     

    We chose 12–26-week-old rats because

    they are comparable with human teenagers—

    notably frequent users of mobile phones—with

    respect to age. The situation of the growing

    brain might deserve special concern from society

    because biologic and maturational

    processes are particularly vulnerable during the

    growth process. The intense use of mobile

    phones by youngsters is a serious consideration.

    A neuronal damage of the kind described

    here may not have immediately demonstrable

    consequences, even if repeated. In the long

    run, however, it may result in reduced brain

    reserve capacity that might be unveiled by

    other later neuronal disease or even the wear

    and tear of aging. We cannot exclude that

    after some decades of (often) daily use, a

    whole generation of users may suffer negative

    effects, perhaps as early as in middle age.

     

    Correction

    Figure 1 in the original manuscript was

    cited in “Materials and Methods” and

    illustrated albumin leakage that we had

    reported earlier. The figure showed

    examples of cross-sections of the brains

    of rats sacrificed immediately after exposure

    to microwaves. Because this could

    be misunderstood, in the interest of

    clarity and with the permission of the

    editor, we have replaced that figure.

     

    The new Figure 1 is now cited in

    “Results” and shows animals from the

    present study. Figure 1A illustrates the

    brain of a sham-exposed control animal,

    and Figure 1B illustrates an animal

    exposed to 2 mW/kg for 2 hr.

     

    REFERENCES

     

    Adey W, Byus C, Cain C, Higgins R, Jones R, Kean C, et al. 1999.

    Spontaneous and nitrosourea-induced primary tumors of

    the central nervous system in Fisher 344 rats exposed to

    836 MHz modulated microwaves. Radiat Res 152:293–302.

     

    Crawford M. 1974. Generation of standard EM field using TEM

    transmission cells. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat EMC

    16:189–195.

     

    Fritze K, Sommer C, Schmitz B, Mies G, Hossman K, Kiessling M,

    et al. 1997. Effect of global system for mobile communication

    (GSM) microwave exposure on blood-brain barrier

    permeability in rat. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 94:465–470.

     

    Gruenau SP, Oscar KJ, Folker MT, Rapoport SI. 1982. Absence

    of microwave effect on blood-brain-barrier permeability to

    [C-14]-labeled sucrose in the conscious rat. Exp Neurol

    75:299–307.

     

    Hardell L, Hallquist A, Hansson Mild K, Carlberg M, Påhlson A,

    et al. 2002. Cellular and cordless telephones and the risk

    for brain tumours. Eur J Cancer Prev 11:377–386.

     

    Hassel B, Iversen E, Fonnum F. 1994. Neurotoxicity of albumin

    in-vivo. Neurosci Lett 167:29–32.

     

    Hyland G. 2000. Physics and biology of mobile telephony. Lancet

    356:1833–1836.

     

    Malmgren L. 1998. Radio Frequency Systems for NMR Imaging:

    Coil Development and Studies of Non-Thermal Biological

    Effects [PhD thesis]. Lund, Sweden:Department of Applied

    Electronics, Lund University.

     

    Martens L, Van Hese J, De Sutter D, De Wagter C, Malmgren L,

    Persson BRR, et al. 1993. Electromagnetic field calculations

    used for exposure experiments on small animals in

    TEM-cells. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 30:73–81

     

    Oscar K, Hawkins T. 1977. Microwave alteration of the blood-

    brain barrier system of rats. Brain Res 126:281–293.

     

    Persson B, Salford L. 1996. Permeability of the blood-brain barrier

    in rats induced by continuous wave and pulse-modulated

    915 MHz electromagnetic radiation exposure in

    TEM-cells. In: Proceedings of the COST 244 Workshop,

    Kuopio Finland, 3–4 September 1995 (Chiabrera A,

    Juutilainen J, eds). EU DG XIII. Brussels:COST 244, 66–72.

     

    Persson B, Salford L, Brun A. 1997. Blood-brain barrier permeability

    in rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in

    wireless communication. Wireless Networks 3:455–461.

     

    Prato F, Frappier J, Shivers R, Kavaliers M, Zabel P, Drost D, et

    al. 1990. Magnetic resonance imaging increases the blood-

    brain barrier permeability to 153-gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic

    acid in rats. Brain Res 523:301–304.

     

    Repacholi M, Basten A, Gebski V, Noonan D, Finnie J, Harris A.

    1997. Lymphomas in Eµ-Pim1 transgenic mice exposed to

    pulsed 900 MHz electromagnetic fields. Radiat Res

    147:631–640.

     

    Salford LG, Brun A, Eberhardt J, Malmgren L, Persson B. 1992.

    Electromagnetic field-induced permeability of the blood-

    brain barrier shown by immunohistochemical methods. In:

    Interaction Mechanism of Low-Level Electromagnetic

    Fields in Living Systems (Nordén B, Ramel C, eds). Oxford,

    UK:Oxford University Press, 251–258.

     

    Salford LG, Brun A, Eberhardt J, Persson B. 1993. Permeability

    of the blood-brain barrier induced by 915 MHz electromagnetic

    radiation, continuous wave and modulated at 8, 16,

    50, 200 Hz. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 30:293–301.

     

    Salford LG, Brun A, Persson B. 1997a. Brain tumour development

    in rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in

    wireless communication. Wireless Networks 3:463–469.

     

    Salford LG, Brun A, Sturesson K, Eberhardt J, Persson B. 1994.

    Permeability of the blood-brain barrier induced by 915 MHz

    electromagnetic radiation, continuous wave and modulated

    at 8, 16, 50, and 200 Hz. Microsc Res Techn 27:535–542.

     

    Salford LG, Persson B, Brun A. 1997b. Neurological aspects on

    wireless communication. In: Non-Thermal Effects of RF

    Electromagnetic Fields (Bernhardt JH, Matthes R, Repacholi

    MH, eds). Munich, Germany:International Commission on

    Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, 131–143.

     

    Salford LG, Persson B, Malmgren L, Brun A. 2001. Téléphonie

    mobile et barrière sang-cerveau. In: Téléphonie Mobile—

    Effets Potentiels sur la Santé des Ondes Électromagnétiques

    de Haute Fréquence (Pietteur Marco, ed). Embourg,

    Belgium:Collection Resurgence, 141–152.

     

    Schirmacher A, Winters S, Fischer S, Goeke J, Galla HJ,

    Kullnick U, et al. 2000. Electromagnetic fields (1.8 GHz)

    increase the permeability to sucrose of the blood-brain

    barrier in vitro. Bioelectromagnetics 21:338–345.

     

    Shivers R, Kavaliers M, Teskey G, Prato F, Pelletier R. 1987.

    Magnetic resonance imaging temporarily alters blood-

    brain barrier in the rat. Neurosci Lett 76:25–31.

     

    Töre F, Dulou P-E, Haro E, Veyret B, Aubineau P. 2001. Two-hour

    exposure to 2 W/kg, 900 MHz GSM microwaves induces

    plasma protein extravasation in rat brain. In: Proceedings

    from the 5th International Congress of the European

    Bioelectromagnetics Association, 6 September 2001,

    Helsinki, Finland (Hietanen M, Jokela K, Juutilainen, J, eds).

    Helsinki:Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 43–45.

     

    Environmental Health Perspectives • VOLUME 111 | NUMBER 7 | June 2003

     

     

     



    What do you think of this story?

    Select one of the options below. Your feedback will help tell CNN producers what to do with this iReport. If you'd like, you can explain your choice in the comments below.
    Be and editor! Choose an option below:
      Awesome! Put this on TV! Almost! Needs work. This submission violates iReport's community guidelines.

    Comments

    Log in to comment

    iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.

    Add your Story Add your Story