PETA vs Meat Eaters
PETA's Campaign To Turn Man Vegetarian Is Unnatural.
While PETA performs obviously necessary tasks such as motivating people to improve the care and protection of animals from the farm to sea, their campaign to turn humans from omnivorous into vegetarian is contrary to nature and animal behavior.
For example whales, dolphins, polar bears, seals, penguins, baboons, wolves, dogs, cats, birds and many, many more animals all eat meat as nature has designed...why should the human species be treated differently? ...wouldn't that be UN-NATURAL?
What sets the human species apart from wild animals is that humans go a much, much longer way towards killing of their prey with the least amount of suffering versus what occurs in nature amongst all other animal species. While it is true humans can do much to improve farm animal care (ie chickens, dairy cows etc), and protect other species that suffer because of human encroachment, the little that we do, is significantly better than say the way lions stalk and kill their prey, or the way birds swoop their prey up with their sharp talons and feed the partially live animal to their veracious babies, or how some animal parents will maim but not kill an animal so they can teach their offspring to hunt. Given the pain and suffering that occurs in the non-human animal kingdom, why does PETA paint humans as "evil" for being omnivorous and eating meat?
With this being said, PETA would be better suited to stay on message and work to improve human's care of animals and not stop our natural and God given right to kill and eat them as they do.
What are your thoughts?
What do you think of this story?
iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.

Comments