|
|
Posted March 15, 2010
by
|
toronto, Ontario
![]() |
This iReport is part of an assignment:
Connect the World: Ask Connectors of the Day |
The decline of Israel and the prospects for peace
By Jonathan Cook
[New Left Project interview with journalist Jonathan Cook]
What did you make of Ehud Barak’s recent comparison of Israel to South Africa?
We should be extremely wary of ascribing a leftwing agenda to senior Israeli politicians who make use of the word “apartheid” in the Israeli-Palestinian context. Barak was not claiming that Israel is an apartheid state when he addressed the high-powered delegates at the Herzliya conference last month; he was warning the Netanyahu government that its approach to the two-state solution was endangering Israel’s legitimacy in the eyes of the world that would eventually lead to it being called an apartheid state. He was politicking. His goal was to intimidate Netanyahu into signing up to his, and the Israeli centre’s, long-standing agenda of “unilateral separation”: statehood imposed on the Palestinians as a series of bantustans (be sure, the irony is entirely lost on Barak and others). Barak knows that Netanyahu currently has no intention of creating any kind of Palestinian state, even a bogus one, despite his commitments to the U.S.
The last senior Israeli politician to talk of....continue http://www.aljazeera.com/news/articles/39/The-decline-of-Israel-and-the-prospects-for-peace.html
What do you think of this story?
iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.



Comments