Share this on:
 E-mail
117
VIEWS
 
RECOMMENDS
0
SHARES
About this iReport
  • Approved for CNN

  • Click to view dfsphoto's profile
    Posted February 18, 2011 by
    dfsphoto
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Assignment
    Assignment
    This iReport is part of an assignment:
    HDR photography: Love it or hate it?

    More from dfsphoto

    Stonehenge in HDR

     

    CNN PRODUCER NOTE     dfsphoto says he took three images and used software to combine the best parts of the image. He says he believes HDR can be more accurate than standard photography if used in the right way. 'If you use the tools to enhance the image and give it a more realistic feel, I think you're in a different moral area than if you're trying to create something.' He also added that digital photography changes images. 'You didn't have this problem in film. I could have taken the regular image in the film and adjusted the contrast, etc. In digital photography if there's no data there, there will never be data there.'
    - nsaidi, CNN iReport producer

    The Shot

     

    My wife and I were on a bus tour to Stonehenge while on vacation in the UK. We arrived in the afternoon after visiting Windsor and Bath. We were at Stonehenge for about 40 minutes. The light was pretty good but there were clouds rolling in.

     

    As the clouds rolled in, my wife noticed a break in the clouds behind us. I ran around to the other side to get the light behind the stones. I had my 5D set to autobracket the exposures in 1-stop increments. normal, -1, +1. I laid down on the ground to get the horizon low in the shot and include the light at the top. (I'm sure the other tourists loved that!)

     

    The Processing

     

     

    The under exposed image captured the detail in the sky, the over-exposed image captured the details in the stones. The normal exposure got everything in-between.

     

    I combined them in a program call Photomatix before doing the final edits in Photoshop CS2.

     

    Now, some will say the HRD image wasn't what was really there. I disagree. The human eye can react to light very quickly. As I looked to the sky I could see the clouds and the light coming through. As I looked at the stones I could see all the details there.

     

    For the photo to truly represent what I saw, the HDR treatment was the only way to go.

     

    By looking at the original image you can see that the sky is washed out and stones are too dark. This is what all the other folks got. I can assure you they all think their photos didn't do the scene justice.

     

    I do not like the overly garish HDR that some folks like. I use it as a tool to more accurately capture the true scene, not just what a single snap of the camera reveals

     

    HDR helped me communicate the image from my mind's eye in way that could not be done with a single exposure.

     

    This image was won a couple of awards and is one of my most popular prints.

     

    David

    What do you think of this story?

    Select one of the options below. Your feedback will help tell CNN producers what to do with this iReport. If you'd like, you can explain your choice in the comments below.
    Be and editor! Choose an option below:
      Awesome! Put this on TV! Almost! Needs work. This submission violates iReport's community guidelines.

    Comments

    Log in to comment

    iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.

    Add your Story Add your Story