(A google translation from Swedish to English, original in Swedish via this link http://www.mynewsdesk.com/se/pressroom/ns-sensus/news/view/eu-olaglig-kartell-avsloejas-daer-sveriges-regering-aer-huvudman-tillsammans-med-myndigheten-foersaekringskassan-och-vissa-foervaltningsdomstolar-20127  )                                               

"A cartel is a formal agreement between the companies with the intention of putting the market competition. The members of the cartel agree to coordinate their prices and production with each other. Most competition laws prohibiting cartels."

"A cartel may also be an organized association of authorities of the adjudication balance of power out of play."                                                                                           

Where according to the working group AMBU, which proved to the EU Commission in the notification of the date 2009-05-27 and any additions made to this notification, a general procedure within the Social Insurance Agency and certain administrative tribunals thus constituting a major legal scandal in the State of Sweden to Swedish Europeans in general, leaves of State Sweden EU rights to free joke of the EU / EEA as health consumers under current EU law by the state Sweden is also obliged to under the contract, but not so demonstrably do.                                                                     

On this basis, concluded that the state Sweden is not a legally secure state for the Swedish EU citizens who want to use the EU right to cross-border healthcare. The review process is completed and the EU Commission is considering how best to proceed on the basis of all the evidence together.                                       

In addition, the State of Sweden in response (the Swedish government's response letter to the EU Commission by the date July 21, 2010 S2010/3209/HS, page 2 paragraph 3, quote, "The disease or health condition are treated within the general healthcare system in Sweden" and paragraph 4 the same page) ) also protects Insurance Agency noted that the Swedish government agrees and is therefore an EU illegal cartel (Swedish Government, Insurance Agency and some courts) also revealed that the Swedish Government is the principal!                                                        

When the Swedish Social Insurance Agency and certain administrative courts reject cross-border healthcare within the EU / EEA from "Swedish public healthcare system", which is not defined in Swedish legislation (the Board's response to 2011-02-11 Dnr 3.2-5722/2011 consolidates / certify that legally), and addition, the concept of "Swedish public health care system" a "discretion under EU law, then are Swedish EU citizens EU rights tucked away generally.                          

In addition it clear that EU law, Case Court Case C-85/99 Offermanns paragraph 28 is very clear. They show that the social security benefit will be defined by law to be valid. (Logic would then also have restrictions to the benefit to be legally resolved.)                                                                                    

In some Swedish administrative courts then do exactly as Insurance and judges for the benefit of Insurance "view" from the Swedish law undefined term "Swedish public health care system," these tend to be miscarriage of justice!                                                                  

Many Swedish citizens have over decisions by the Social Insurance Agency and certain administrative tribunals make decisions and judgments against him or her just due. what is served above and thus the EU illegal because been denied their rights by the EU Insurance Agency and also by some Swedish administrative courts!                                                              

In addition, under EU law Case C-224/97 Ciola paragraphs 26-34 is very clear that the Administrative Court is to protect citizens against such abuses of authority.

In addition, based on the Charter of Rights as follows;

Article 20 Equality before the law everyone is equal before the law.                                                                               

Article 21 Non-Discrimination 2nd within the scope of the treaties, and without prejudice to any special provisions in them, any discrimination on grounds of nationality shall be prohibited.                                                   

Here it is concluded that the Swedish EU nationals who have sought cross-border care and rejection decisions and judgments against him based on that decision and based them on the basis of the concept of "Swedish public health care system" as also to its Charter of Fundamental Rights (legally binding by date 2009-12-01) not treated equally according to other EU citizens receiving services under the law's full width and also discriminated against just because that they are Swedish citizens ( any discrimination on grounds of nationality shall be prohibited.) of the Social Insurance Agency and partly on account of certain administrative tribunals.                                                        

I.e. .other EU citizens may use the legislation full width but the Europeans of Swedish nationality restricts the right of Swedish public health system. (a system also lacks the legality of the law)

Sweden's government is informed and well aware of this but has taken a passive and hence with their inaction, they are complicit!                                                          

The state Sweden is thus not a true safe state for Swedish citizens from cross-border healthcare, which is one EU law and applies to all EU citizens, but this right is deprived of the EU-Swedish citizens in general with the Government of Sweden that involved parties.               

Abstract

The year 2011 found that Swedish citizens in general non-enjoyment of rule of law based on EU rights and to which is most remarkable, that the Government of Sweden is the manager of a cartel to prevent the EU right of free movement of health care market in EU / EEA for Swedish citizens!                                                           

Under the Penal Code, free interpretation, is obviously crime suspect there and this is very urgent review of the authority is there to investigate crime. This was served at the Ministry of the letter date 2011-02-10 by ref. SB2009-3520 and is located right on the head / PERMANENT UNDERSECRETARY Marianne Jenryd responsibility to pursue.

2011-04-02

Ulf Bittner, one of three of the working group AMBU

Read more via http://nackskadeforbundet.se/AMBU.php