|
|
Posted September 1, 2008
by
|
New York, New York
![]() |
This iReport is part of an assignment:
Sarah Palin's political future |
Another campaign attempt?
Am I the only one considering that the McCain's camp knowledge of Palin's daughter's pregnancy was considered to be a possible "pro" to their supporters? After all, it seems that the GOP's strategy in recent years has been to paint a picture of Dems as not knowing "the little guy." This is an opportunity for them to show just how pro-life they are, and the certainty of their "value" system.
I put "value" in quotes because I'm not sure you can call something a value when it involves marrying off a child-having-a-child, and the pregnancy most likely having a direct correlation to your own failure in educating your daughter on birth control. Oh, but wait, we can't do that! Because after all, abstinence-only is the only way to go.
There's not only hypocrisy present in this; it's proof that this particular conservative point of view on sex education, unforgivably pro-life, is condemning our young women as opposed to educating and empowering them. I only hope that Bristol finds the courage to tell her she's not going to be a political ploy. What a horrible day for women in this country - we have the possibility of the first female vice-president taking office, and it turns out she seems to have less respect even for her own daughter's best interest , let alone those of American women. Pathetic.
- TAGS:
- 2008_election,
- mccain,
- vp
- GROUPS:
What do you think of this story?
iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.




Comments