Share this on:
 E-mail
317
VIEWS
 
RECOMMENDS
2
SHARES
About this iReport
  • Not vetted for CNN

  • Click to view waynepj3's profile
    Posted September 4, 2008 by
    Location
    Concord, California
    Assignment
    Assignment
    This iReport is part of an assignment:
    McCain's big night: Your reaction

    More from waynepj3

    Sarah Palin feedback and the importance of VP selection

     

    The media is overstating the value of VP selection in terms of the impact it will have on who wins the election. The only true value it brings is it gives us insight into the decision making of Obama and McCain. McCain has been applauded by Fox News and CNN for being a "maverick" and taking a big "gamble" with his selection of Palin. I am personally a 32 year old working husband and father of a 1 year old son. I do not relish the idea of having a 72 year old President who takes wild and surprising risks and gambles with the very future of this country, especially after 8 turbulent years of the Bush Administration. I fail to see how gambling with our future and our country is a positive trait. Is his decision to select Palin indicative of other appointments he would make as president? Shouldnt VP selection be someone who can step in as POTUS and help the president govern? Why wont the media be honest and acknowledge that this selection was an inartful attempt to pander to women voters who are presently strongly in favor of Obama.

     

    Now lets look at Obamas selection of Biden. Even though he had less time than McCain to vet a runningmate I think most would agree that Biden is well qualified to step in should something happen to Obama. He is also someone I think Obama can trust and will help him govern. It would have been considered politically expedient if he picked Hillary and it would have looked like a weak pander to women if he picked Kathleen Sebelius. Honesty in the media is so painfully missing since the passing of Tim Russert. Right now I can tell you CNN and FOx are pro McCain, MSNBC is pro Obama and no one is objective. There was a glimmer of honesty tonight with Toobin's commentary where he fact checked Palin by explaining that Obamas tax plan gives tax cuts to 88% of the people. The role of journalism as Tim Russert put it is to seek the truth not push your political views on others. I can tell Rolin Martin is for Obama and John King and Wolf Blitzer is for McCain. I wouldnt be able to tell who you were for if you were objective.

    What do you think of this story?

    Select one of the options below. Your feedback will help tell CNN producers what to do with this iReport. If you'd like, you can explain your choice in the comments below.
    Be and editor! Choose an option below:
      Awesome! Put this on TV! Almost! Needs work. This submission violates iReport's community guidelines.

    Comments

    Log in to comment

    iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.

    Add your Story Add your Story