- Posted March 12, 2012 by
Little Rock, Arkansas
This iReport is part of an assignment:
- The SCOTUS, Influence and a Reality Check
- Autism - What Can You Say?
- Okay…If You Can’t Afford Health Insurance through the Healthcare Exchanges Then You are Exempt from the Individual Mandate Through the “Hardship” Waiver?
- Not a Smidgen of Corruption or Was There?
- Why Go Through the Motions? Obamacare Has Been Done and Cannot Easily Be Undone Even For Political Gain.
Is the National Organization For Women (NOW) Still Relevant Today?
Notice that in the goal statement it says ALL women, but lately I don't think that is the case. Just this evening I watched a video clip of the spokesman for NOW saying that she did not think that President Obama should reject Bill Mahr's donation to his political action organization. She basically said, Obama needs to win the election, so we don't care where the money comes from.
I don't watch Bill Mahr so I had to do a little digging to find out what horrible things he has said about women and WOW was I offended. If NOW is really protecting women and trying to end all forms of violence against women, then why are they not and have they not condemned Bill Mahr for his ugly words. His words, well I won't repeat of them.
I am not defending Rush Limbaugh. Nor am I defending anyone in the media that attacks women based on social stereotypes or sexuality when they are attempting to be elected to public office. I am offended by them all. What I don't understand is why NOW is showing a double standard. Currently on their website they are condemning Rush Limbaugh and at the same time in public are defending Mahr's contribution to Obama's political campaign.
How can you be taken seriously as an organization when you don't even adhere to your own goal statement?
Other questionable acts by NOW include publicly endorsing Jerry Brown after his campaign member called Meg Whitman a whore.
Their endorsement of Bill Clinton after his sexual indiscretion. Sexual harassment in the workplace?
Is it ALL women you protect NOW? Why can't you protect Meg Whitman or Sarah Palin or Michele Bauchman? Why do those women not count? Do I not count since I am more conservative than progressive?
I think NOW is no longer living up to their mission statement and should do one of two things. Disband or Rename their organization to something that represents their political agenda, but right now, their name implies that they are for the rights of women, but their actions speak otherwise.