Share this on:
 E-mail
17
VIEWS
0
COMMENTS
 
SHARES
About this iReport
  • Not vetted for CNN

  • Click to view borisright's profile
    Posted June 4, 2012 by
    borisright
    Location
    California
    Assignment
    Assignment
    This iReport is part of an assignment:
    Impact Your World

    More from borisright

    GUILT AND SHAME OF TOYOTA CORPORATION

     
    There are new circumstances surrounding the case "K'Zorin v. Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc." with its truly historical name "K’ZORIN 777-BELIEF v. TOYOTA 666-ODDITY", or something like that, easy speaking "777 v. 666" and those new circumstances appeared as follows:

    The recently unknown for this appellant fact that THE CHIEF JUSTICE IS IN CHARGE OF CALIFORNIA JUDICIAL COUNCIL is working for Plaintiff/Appellant/Petitioner. This information was just calculated from correspondence having cliché with the name of the Chief Justice; this is completely unknown information leaked from Sacramento clerks exactly and Appellant’s good faith consideration never before was occupied with that. As such the delay in any followed review has appeared completely and reasonably suspicious.

    1. The main point in the wrongly delayed petition for review, aka first issue captioned as 1. Whether the California Judicial Council Forms (“JCC Forms”) should have been more respected (Petition at 8) was the same issue that was ignored by the low court and is still ignored by appellate instances: NOBODY IN THIS STATE NEEDS THOSE FORMALLY EXISTED CALIFORNIA JUDICIAL COUNCIL FORMS TO GET THEM NOTICED, READ, USED OR EVEN RESPECTED. The fact that issue is denied exactly under true name of the Chair of Judicial Council of California means nothing, but banal PROTECTION OF ESPRIT DE CORPS. That is.

    As such, the case S201504, “K’ZORIN v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES USA, Inc.” ("777 v. 666") even within reasonable delay, must be reviewed and Appellant just next time prays for that. So, please just do your job properly, as it predesigned for policymaking body of the California courts; go ahead* my happy SEVEN!


    This is shortened version. Plaintiff went to public and has delivered his view before society, with “SHAME-BASED DEFENDANT’S CULTURE OVERCOMES CALIFORNIA FAIR JUSTICE”, as his fifth document published with the support of http://www.leagle.com, following this link below:
    http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20CACO%2020120214036.xml&docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR.

    *P.S. Almost forgot, an American humor must be either: no fun – no run (ask politicians, they know better); well, “At THREE BEARS v. GOLDILOCKS those “Three Bears” were then an aggrieved party, ... but then chose that Toyota Beast Day to play back ... against my Goldilocks and me”; Goldilocks. Pic. by Batten_1890.

    What do you think of this story?

    Select one of the options below. Your feedback will help tell CNN producers what to do with this iReport. If you'd like, you can explain your choice in the comments below.
    Be and editor! Choose an option below:
      Awesome! Put this on TV! Almost! Needs work. This submission violates iReport's community guidelines.

    Comments

    Log in to comment

    iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.

    Add your Story Add your Story