- Posted October 9, 2012 by
This iReport is part of an assignment:
Questions for Candy Crowley
Romney can only delay progress
Pres Obama's economic strategies, while slower than many would like, are inline with economist projections, positive and progress is picking up steam. On the horizon are many energy, infrastructure, education jobs and reforms that most economists agree will create millions jobs over the next 4+ years.
Given the time required to change policies in Washington, the stalling of House/Senate and so on. It will likely take a minimum of 1-2 years before any of your policies can even start to be realized. Over this time, we would have progressed under the President's policies to projected 6-6.5% unemployment, have 21st century healthcare, retain and improved social programs, etc.
So, why should America decide to make a change versus maintaining the policies that have just saved us from economic disaster, brought us to 21st century healthcare, and are projected to shortly return us to our prior economic thriving last witness under Clinton?