- Posted October 14, 2012 by
Discontinueing Efforts to Address Constitrutional Questions
This is to advise you that I will not proceed any further with this civil lawsuit and my attempts to address three constitutional questions, the right to a trial that is circumvented through non-criminal responsibility before trial, the freedom of expression, which was infringed through section 264 of the criminal code for "feeling threatened in any manner", and the right to privacy, the seizure of personal computers that are returned and being unable to obtain an order for any copies to be destroyed from the court.
As mentioned in the Abuse of Process motion of October 21, 2011 where the Appeal R v Creighton ceased to exist or more specifically was not given to the Honourable Superior Court Judge Francine Charbonneau, resulting in rejecting the Appeal and the motions included, I am being assaulted through powerful radar from neighboring homes and in the court house its self with the aim of inflicting deadly cancers, specifically focused on the shin bone linked to leukemia and the lungs during these proceedings.
I am therefor forced to discontinue these efforts and proceedings due to this organized crime and may not be present on the 16th and 17th.
BERNARD, ROY (Justice – Québec)
Direction du Contentieux
1, rue Notre-Dame Est, bureau 8.00
Montréal (Québec) H2Y 1B6
Tel.: (514) 393-2336 Fax: (514) 873-7074
Code d’enregistrement: BB1721
Psychological Harassment Information Association