176
VIEWS
18
COMMENTS
 
SHARES
About this iReport
  • Not verified by CNN

  • Click to view DannyH's profile
    Posted November 2, 2012 by
    DannyH
    Location
    Laval, Quebec

    More from DannyH

    Criminal Harassment Network Routines and Strategies, Freedom of Expression and Cyberbullying

     

    The strategies and routines of criminal harassment networks, Supreme Court of Canada laws that can be used to circumvent the right to trial in 2012  -- , the weakening of the Freedom of Expression in Canada, and a new Canadian Cyberbullying law that makes the only human right defender that documents Cyberbullying and suicide through influence of the mind vulnerable to civil lawsuits when he documents mobbing, corruption, and organized crime on the internet.

    Criminal Harassment Network Routines and Strategies, Freedom of Expression and Cyberbullying - CNN Ireport (article link)
    http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-870844

    Criminal Harassment Network Strategy (Abuse Strategy)

     

    According to Marie-France Hirigoyen psychiatrist the intent of many emotional abusers is to systematically "destabilize" and confuse their victims (with irrational, threatening behavior that preys on the victim's fears and self-doubts), to isolate and control them and ultimately to destroy their identity, and often emotional abuse builds over a long period of time until it becomes so unbearable that victims lash out in frustration and anger aka hitting back, only to appear unstable and aggressive themselves, which could be linked to or the cause of rage shooting and rampages.

     

    Often, emotional abuse builds over a long period of time until it becomes so unbearable that victims lash out in frustration and anger, only to appear unstable and aggressive themselves. -- This, according to Hirigoyen, is the intent of many abusers: to systematically "destabilize" and confuse their victims (with irrational, threatening behavior that preys on the victim's fears and self-doubts), to isolate and control them and ultimately to destroy their identity. -- psychiatrist Marie-France Hirigoyen, author of Le harcèlement moral

    Criminal Harassment Network Strategy (Damage, Provocation, Rampage)

     

    Pushing  people to violence consist of abuse or inflicting a damage, financial  loss, homelessness, smear campaign and criminal record, serious illness  and cancer, fear linked to honor and repetitive humiliation, and using  provocation to push people to aggressiveness, looking deranged or  enraged, or violence. Any resulting violence is used to repress the  targeted citizen and any rage shooting is used to advocating gun  control, a defenseless population, which makes citizen more vulnerable  to abuse, hidden abuse, or subjugation through organized crime.

     

    A Criminal Harassment Network Routine (Repetitive Humiliation)

     

    A routine example is that I would go to a grocery store when highly sleep deprived through sound technology (HSS Hypersonic Sound), criminal harassment participants would mix in with other shoppers and use different forms of threats and provocation to induce stress and adrenaline, try to stand directly behind me at the cash register, and interpret the adrenaline and voice fluctuations as fear "you're scared", which is linked to fear and honor, and attempts at repetitive humiliation.

     

    A Criminal Harassment Network Routine (Psychiatric Intervention)

     

    Criminal Allegations of uttering threats are combined with powerful radar assaults and assessment orders for non-criminal responsibility before trial. The threat of intervention is linked to behavior that can be used to justify psychiatric intervention that leads to incarceration during the long and delayed criminal proceedings. The behavior linked to taking protective measures against the powerful radar assaults through attenuation materials and a person's personal and household hygiene that begins to suffers due to attempts to avoid these. The criminal harassment network routine of threats to induce adrenaline and cortisol, trying to standing directly behind the victim at the cash register, and interpret the voice fluctuations as fear is changed to threats of psychiatric intervention that leads to incarceration, participants trying to smell the victim, saying "he smells bad", and criminal harassment participants theater or pretense that they are undercover psychiatrist who wants to intervene and incarcerate the victim of criminal harassment.

     

    Criminal Harassment Network Smear Campaign Strategy ("Run Away or Get Cancer")

     

    After allegations of uttering threats and an assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial the targeted citizen is assaulted with powerful radar with criminal harassment participants saying "run away or get cancer". When the targeted citizen runs away they are recaptured and incarcerated for the assessment order and during the criminal proceedings, isolated.

     

    Criminal Harassment Network Smear Campaign Strategy (Uttering Threats)

     

    One psychological manipulation that criminal harassment participants try to do is to try to lead the targeted citizen to believe that if they act aggressive the participants will be fearful, which is combined with the criminal harassment networks routine of attempting to induce fear and interpret voice fluctuations as fear, and linked to manipulating the targeted citizen into reacting to this through aggressiveness and their own attempts to induce fear in return. It is a psychological manipulation and attempt at conditioning towards an aggressive response or retaliation from threats, which is supposed to eventually lead to more aggressive behavior and uttering threats, and the crime of uttering threats is linked to the smear campaign strategy.

     

    Criminal Harassment Network Smear Campaign Strategy (Uttering Threats, Neighbors)

     

    Following the allegations of uttering threats that are combined with powerful radar assaults from neighboring homes, provocation is used through sound technology along with the assaults, a cancer causing weapon, and attempts at manipulation the targeted citizen to threaten, retaliate, or utter threats towards neighbors, which can be linked to police surveillance of a "dangerous individual", another charger of uttering threats, and incarceration without release during the proceedings.

     

    Criminal Harassment Network Smear Campaign Strategy (Uttering Threats, Online Activity, Lash Out in Anger, Cyberbullying)

     

    This strategy is similar to the "Uttering Threats, Neighbors" strategy but also includes the threat of civil lawsuits and the new cyberbullying law. After wrong doing citizens want to denounce perpetrators of wrong doing, if they are isolated they will do so online. The strategy is the same as the previous, powerful radar assaults that are combined with provocation through sound technology, which leads to anger, which can lead to lashing out or uttering threats online and defaming those involved, the police and crown prosecutors. For this new online routine to work the freedom of expression needed to be weakened and a new cyberbullying law was needed to give victims the tools to obtain the IP address for a civil lawsuits, or to use these for threats to prevent online denunciation and exposure by the perpetrators, the criminal harassment network organized crime participants. (Marie-France Hirigoyen psychiatrist)

    Repression of Workplace Psychological Harassment Knowledge Linked to Criminal Harassment Networks? - (Repression, Knowledge, Human Right Defenders)

    One strategy of workplace psychological harassment is to engage in this behavior and emotional abuse in attempts to destabilize an employee so that they lash-out in anger only to look deranged and aggressive, through violence, uttering threats, sabotage, etc., to get rid of them. The strategy of criminal harassment networks are very similar but instead of an employer being the "workplace police" and getting rid of the employee the city police are the ones who file criminal allegations towards the victim of criminal harassment. These criminal harassment networks use criminal harassment and psychological manipulation in attempts to use the criminal allegation charge of of uttering threats for any targeted citizen that lashes out in this way or is manipulated towards this behavior, similar to the workplace psychological harassment strategy. This strategy may be one of the explanations for why workplace psychological harassment knowledge and human right defenders who document these issues are targeted, repressed, inflicted with cancer, etc.,. Any resulting violence is used to repress the targeted citizen and any rage shooting is used to advocate gun control. (see Rage Shooting Factors)

    The Rundown, Setups and Deception (video)

    A video clip that illustrates a setup and deception, a psychological manipulation.
    http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-883414
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKsVqeAIhMM

     

    "One of the constitutional questions that I am trying to address is  very basic in terms of civil and human rights, it is the right to a  trial." -- "The British regimes are circumventing the right to a trial  through the combination of non-criminal responsibility before trial and  their use of powerful radar assaults. It is used to find a person guilty  of having committed the crime without a trial but not guilty due to  mental illness. There is no trial, no presentation of obvious charter  violations such as freedom of expression,

    entering and searching a dwelling home without a warrant, seizing  personal computers without a warrant, and the seizure of personal  computers without a warrant and any of their copies become legal too."

    Addressing Civil, Human Rights Violations, and Constitutional Questions In the Canada - CNN iReport (article link)
    http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-856600

    "The difficulty and life threatening activity of trying to address  civil rights, human rights, and constitutional questions while organized  crime tries to repress you in Canada."

    ADDRESSING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS

    I'm trying to address  different constitutional questions while being assaulted with powerful  radar from neighboring homes, public places, and court too the same way I  was during the long and delayed criminal proceedings.

    1. The  right to a Trial: circumventing the right to a trial through the use of  non-criminal responsibility before trial 672.12(3)(a) and 672.12(3)(b)  combined with powerful radar assaults to encourage it's use and success.

    2.  Freedom of Expression: the criminal allegations, S. 264.1(1)(a)   uttering threats, that went to trial after the charter issue for freedom  of expression was raised and dismissed were fabricated from a published  Mobbing Research CNN iReport article.

    3. The Right to Privacy:  the seizure of private computers without a warrant and getting an order  issued to destroy any existing copies once they are returned. This was  refused in Superior Court, no object when the Crown claims that there  are none. If the Crown is mistaken about the Police having copies I have  to sue someone, if the order to destroy any existing copies is given  these are now illegal by anyone having them, including the police, or a  police seizure from another police organization of a city hall lawyer,  etc.

    It seems the Police, Court system and Judges, are all linked to a  criminal harassment network that I have been documenting and trying to  repress me through smear campaigns and serious illness, leukemia.

    CANADIAN CRIMINAL CODE

    Where court may order assessment
    672.12 (1) The court may make an assessment order at any stage of proceedings against the accused of its own motion, on application of the accused or, subject to subsections (2) and (3), on application of the prosecutor.
    Limitation on prosecutor’s application for assessment of fitness
    (2)  Where the prosecutor applies for an assessment in order to determine  whether the accused is unfit to stand trial for an offence that is  prosecuted by way of summary conviction, the court may only order the  assessment if
    (a) the accused raised the issue of fitness; or
    (b) the prosecutor satisfies the court that there are reasonable grounds to doubt that the accused is fit to stand trial.
    Limitation on prosecutor’s application for assessment
    (3)  Where the prosecutor applies for an assessment in order to determine  whether the accused was suffering from a mental disorder at the time of  the offence so as to be exempt from criminal responsibility, the court  may only order the assessment if
    (a) the accused puts his or her mental capacity for criminal intent into issue; or
    (b) the prosecutor satisfies the court that there are reasonable  grounds to doubt that the accused is criminally responsible for the  alleged offence, on account of mental disorder.

     

    Uttering threats
    264.1 (1) Every one commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat
    (a) to cause death or bodily harm to any person;
    (b) to burn, destroy or damage real or personal property; or
    (c) to kill, poison or injure an animal or bird that is the property of any person.

    Note, in my case the word Rampage was replaced by the word Carnage by  the Police. They do not mean the same thing or fit the description of  the criminal code in the same way.

    The Supreme Court judgment of R v Keegstra where the judges state  that written uttering threats are not exempt from the freedom of  expression since they are not physical, with physical expressions having  limits. During the proceedings the lower court judge was told that the  Supreme Court judges probably included this specifically knowing that if  any criminal allegations were to be fabricated from a published article  because the police disapproved of the content and to give a journalist  "problems", the criminal allegation would be uttering threats. Strangely  I believe the said victim showed up at the trial proceedings and  quickly left without testifying, and the Crown prosecutor no longer  wished to use one of their evidence pieces, the Police printing of the  shared Mobbing Research article.

    MOBBING RESEARCH

    These are linked to three smear campaign strategies.

    1. The mob is combining the use of non-criminal responsibility before  trial with powerful radar assaults from neighboring homes, public  places, and at the court house during the proceedings. This encourages  the use of non-criminal responsibility along with ignorance, the belief  that non-criminal responsible of having committed a crime is the same as  simply being innocent of having committed the crime, and increases it  chance of success. The citizen is found guilty without a trial of having  committed the crime but not guilty due to mental illness, there are no  charter violation presentation such as entering a home without a warrant  and seizing personal computers without a warrant, the unlawful seizure  of personal computers becomes legal.

    2. The mob is using a criminal harassment network to target citizens  through threats and psychological harassment. One psychological  manipulation is linked to a routine of using threats and provocation  followed by stating the victim of the threats is "you're scared" and  interpreting voice fluctuations as fear, which are linked to fear and  honor, repetitive humiliation. The psychological manipulation consists  of using this routine, participants acting fearful at any signs of anger  or aggressiveness from the targeted citizen, and attempting to push the  citizen to utter threats in retaliation to this routine and through  this psychological manipulation, which leads to the crime of uttering  threats following a complaint by participants. This criminal harassment  network is trying to expand this smear campaign strategy with  participants to online activity, which means the freedom of expression  protection needs to be weakened. The strategy would consists of citizens  being threatened and ranting online or uttering threats on a foreign  website for example, followed by a city participants filing a complaint  saying that they felt threatened. etc.

    3. Following the seizure of personal computers without a warrant the  Crown can simply return the computers and claim that there are no  copies. According to the courts the judges cannot order the destruction  of any existing copies because there is "no object" to destroy according  to the Crown prosecutor. The difference is that if the Crown is  mistaken and the Police do have copies, obtaining private information  from them or try to use them in the future the citizen must sue someone  for damages, possibly from incarceration, which makes this even more  unlikely. If an order is given by the courts to destroy any existing  copies these become illegal, which means no one including the Police can  use these and their possession is a crime.

    NOTES

     

    Smear Campaign and Uttering Threats: The Police deny the  existence of this criminal harassment network involved in provocation  and a smear campaign strategy using the crime of uttering threats.  Another part of this strategy that is mentioned is their expansion to  apply this smear campaign strategy to online activity requiring  weakening the freedom of expression. Here is another part of this smear  campaign strategy that the Police deny exists linked to the the crime of  uttering threats. Once the criminal allegations are filed by the Police  they can also request surveillance through this specific crime of  uttering threats, and this is again combined with organized crime using  provocation through sound technology while the citizen is under  surveillance by the Police.

    Damage, Provocation, Rampage: The  damage this criminal harassment network inflicts on a targeted citizen  through financial loss, smear campaign, damage to a man's testicles, and  cancer for example are used in provocation, which are linked to  rampages or rage shootings. (see the video illustration)

    Any Pro-Bono or Civil Rights advocate lawyers who wishes to help  address these constitutional questions please call Danny at 450-622-7117  and leave a message. If your call has not been returned within a day it  is probably because the Canadian secret police has rerouted your call  or his, isolation.

     

    New Canadian Cyberbullying Law

    The creator and founder of Psychological Harassment Information Association was charged with allegations of uttering threats towards women on facebook when he published a mobbing research article and during the long criminal proceedings he was assaulted with powerful radar. PHIA is the only English website on this issue and documents cyberbullying, death or homicides through influence of the mind to prevent them. A bullying reporting system idea was also created so that policing the internet or reducing the freedom of expression would not be required  ..  so during the period of time that he is in court defending himself from false allegations that are very costly and attacked through organized crime, powerful radar assaults aimed at inflicting deadly cancers, the Supreme Court of Canada passes a cyberbullying law that will actually give adult victims of cyberbullying the IP address for civil lawsuits, Police members and Crown prosecutors for example who claim to be defamed on the internet when isolated victims of false allegations write about them on the internet. The threat of more costly and long proceeding that are combined with powerful radar assaults aimed at inflicting deadly cancers.

    The issue, if these websites and their creators are repressed through false allegations and murdered through cancer, was this new cyberbullying law really about protecting teen victims of cyberbullying or the danger and threat of being exposed, "defamed", as they may have witnessed.

     

    Smear Campaign Strategy Illustration, Repression Patterns

    POWERFUL RADAR ASSAULTS AND PSYCHIATRIC INTERVENTION THREAT STRATEGY

    Non-Criminal Responsibility Before Trial, Links to Smear Campaigns - CNN iReport
    http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-808083

    1. Non-Criminal Responsibility before Trial.
    2. Participating Defense Lawyers and Lower Court Judges.
    3. Radiation Technology and Powerful Radar Assaults.
    4. Police Intervention for taking Protection Measures, Shielding, Attenuation, Metal, Sea Water, etc, -- which leads to incarceration during the criminal proceedings and the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial.

     

    Pattern Example

     

    1. radiation technology and powerful radar assaults;
    2. criminal allegations (uttering threats allegation from participants);
    3. insinuations that the defendant is dangerous; (demands that the defendant remain incarcerated for psychological evaluation)
    4. communications interception and surveillance (justification used, uttering threats s.183);
    5. court house participating defense lawyers;
    6. non-criminal responsibility before trial; no charter violations presentation at trial and no trial, ignorance used "plead non-criminal responsible before trial, it is the same as not guilty", shorter assault period and lower criminal proceeding costs.
    7. police intervention for behavior linked to radiation technology assaults, which leads to incarceration during the criminal proceedings and assessment order;
    8. preventing civil lawsuits to recover the loss from false allegations through the continued radiation technology and powerful radar assaults;
    9. long term homicides through deadly cancers, radar assaults focus on the shin bone linked to bone marrow and leukemia, lungs linked to inflammation and scarring resulting in lung cancer, the testicles linked to testosterone production, fertility, sperm mutations and autism, testicular cancer and degrading themes, the top of the head linked to brain cancer, prostate and colon area linked to these cancers.
    10. any resulting violence or rampage is used to repress and incarcerate the targeted citizen, any resulting rage shooting is used to advocate gun control and a defenseless population.

     

    Mobbing Research Notes, Repression

     

    Repression involves targeting citizens through different strategies, pushing targeted citizen to homelessness, smear campaigns, inflicting serious illness and cancer, and by pushing people to violence. Any resulting violence is used to repress and incarcerate them, rage shootings are used to advocate a defenseless population. Pushing people to violence consist of inflicting a damage, financial loss, homelessness, smear campaign and criminal record, serious illness and cancer, and using provocation.

    Repression  involves eliminating  and exhausting the resources of targeted citizen or push them to  homelessness, which reduces their ability to defend themselves.  Technology is now also used for a similar purpose, sound technology is  used for high levels of sleep deprivation, which reduces a targeted  citizens ability to function, and powerful radar assaults are used for  the same purpose and more serious intentions. These may be linked to "hitting back at society" through violence, rampages, or rage shootings.

    Mobbing or criminal harassment network victims who are "hitting back at society" through violence, hiding the cause of this violence or terrible crimes, rage shootings. The perpetrators of the hidden cause and victims of violence or terrible crimes advocate gun control, a defenseless population, which is linked to population subjugation through organized crime and police.

    see Rage Shooting Factors page

    Add your Story Add your Story