- Posted November 13, 2012 by
A picture that illustrates a mobbing and homicide strategy
A picture that illustrates a mobbing and homicide strategy, combining criminal allegations with powerful radar assaults with the intent on inflicting deadly cancers.
In 2012 the Canadian Criminal Code still provides a law that can be used to circumvent the right to a trial, non-criminal responsibility before trial, which means the person is found guilty of having committed the crime without a trial but not criminal responsible.
CANADIAN CRIMINAL CODE
Where court may order assessment
672.12 (1) The court may make an assessment order at any stage of proceedings against the accused of its own motion, on application of the accused or, subject to subsections (2) and (3), on application of the prosecutor.
Limitation on prosecutor’s application for assessment of fitness
(2) Where the prosecutor applies for an assessment in order to determine whether the accused is unfit to stand trial for an offence that is prosecuted by way of summary conviction, the court may only order the assessment if
(a) the accused raised the issue of fitness; or
(b) the prosecutor satisfies the court that there are reasonable grounds to doubt that the accused is fit to stand trial.
Limitation on prosecutor’s application for assessment
(3) Where the prosecutor applies for an assessment in order to determine whether the accused was suffering from a mental disorder at the time of the offence so as to be exempt from criminal responsibility, the court may only order the assessment if
(a) the accused puts his or her mental capacity for criminal intent into issue; or
(b) the prosecutor satisfies the court that there are reasonable grounds to doubt that the accused is criminally responsible for the alleged offence, on account of mental disorder.
A Summary of Events in Canada
"There is no special privileged when it comes to the freedom of expression and the press in Canada, everyone has the same rights.
Recent events mentioned on the site: It can be a bit startling for journalist to see someone incarcerated after publishing a Mobbing Research article, allegations of uttering threats of serious bodily harm and death towards women in sarcasm when the words themselves do not fit the criminal code description "rampage", and the freedom of expression charter protection is dismissed "a trial will have to decide" etc. .. the defendant claims to be assaulted with powerful radar focused on inflict deadly cancer during the long and delayed proceedings etc."
"After the article is published on CNN iReport and shared in a CSPAN facebook discussion area the Police arrest the writer, enter his home without a warrant, search his home without a warrant, seize private computers and hard drives without a warrant, -- the defendant is told by a defense lawyer that following a demand that he remain incarcerated by the Police for a psychological evaluation he will have to remain incarcerated, the defendant dismisses the defense lawyers services, the defense lawyer returns and claims that he will be released, the defendant is released with an assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial that he did not want given his claims of innocence, -- the defendant gives the published article to the Crown, his computers will not need to be searched for evidence and will be returned "seizure without a warrant not justified, a charter violation", the Crown does not drop the charges and maintains the demand for the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial, -- the defendant is assaulted with powerful radar from neighboring homes, criminal harassment participants state that he "has to run away or die of cancer", the Police come to his home 3 or more times and discuss intervention (psychiatric intervention) that leads to incarceration for the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial and during the criminal proceedings for the attempts to protect himself from the powerful radar assaults, shielding materials, metal, faraday cage, etc -- the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility expires, it cannot be renewed given the fact that the first assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial was "unlawful", the defendant does not want it given his claims of innocence, there are no more Police "calls of suspicious vehicles and discussions of psychiatric intervention" -- all charter violation presented at trial, entering and searching a home without a warrant, the seizure of private computers without a warrant, not justifying the seizure without a warrant, the freedom of expression, prejudice from the "unlawful" assessment order before trial, .. , etc, all dismissed, the Crown does not present the said victim, she does not testify and leaves immediately, the Crown no longer wants to present their evidence piece "a printout of the facebook CSPAN discussion where the article was shared, .. , etc, , the defendant is acquitted."
""during the criminal proceedings the Crown was replaced by another, the Police members also seemed to be different people during their testimonies and proceedings" the vulnerability of mental illness made the self representing defendant hesitate in pointing this fact out during the long proceedings, already having battled against one assessment order before trial."