64
VIEWS
30
COMMENTS
 
SHARES
About this iReport
  • Not verified by CNN

  • Click to view DannyH's profile
    Posted November 13, 2012 by
    DannyH
    Location
    Laval, Quebec

    More from DannyH

    A picture that illustrates a mobbing and homicide strategy

     

    A picture that illustrates a mobbing and homicide strategy, combining criminal allegations with powerful radar assaults with the intent on inflicting deadly cancers.

     

    Strategy

     

    In 2012 the Canadian Criminal Code still provides a law that can be used to circumvent the right to a trial, non-criminal responsibility before trial, which means the person is found guilty of having committed the crime without a trial but not criminal responsible.

     

    CANADIAN CRIMINAL CODE

    Where court may order assessment

    672.12 (1) The court may make an assessment order at any stage of proceedings against the accused of its own motion, on application of the accused or, subject to subsections (2) and (3), on application of the prosecutor.
    Limitation on prosecutor’s application for assessment of fitness
    (2) Where the prosecutor applies for an assessment in order to determine whether the accused is unfit to stand trial for an offence that is prosecuted by way of summary conviction, the court may only order the assessment if
    (a) the accused raised the issue of fitness; or
    (b) the prosecutor satisfies the court that there are reasonable grounds to doubt that the accused is fit to stand trial.
    Limitation on prosecutor’s application for assessment
    (3) Where the prosecutor applies for an assessment in order to determine whether the accused was suffering from a mental disorder at the time of the offence so as to be exempt from criminal responsibility, the court may only order the assessment if
    (a) the accused puts his or her mental capacity for criminal intent into issue; or
    (b) the prosecutor satisfies the court that there are reasonable grounds to doubt that the accused is criminally responsible for the alleged offence, on account of mental disorder.

     

    A Summary of Events in Canada

     

    "There  is no special privileged when it comes to the freedom of expression and  the press in Canada, everyone has the same rights.

     

    Recent  events mentioned on the site: It can be a bit startling for journalist  to see someone incarcerated after publishing a Mobbing Research article,  allegations of uttering threats of serious bodily harm and death  towards women in sarcasm when the words themselves do not fit the  criminal code description "rampage", and the freedom of expression  charter protection is dismissed "a trial will have to decide" etc. ..  the defendant claims to be assaulted with powerful radar focused on  inflict deadly cancer during the long and delayed proceedings etc."

     

    "After  the article is published on CNN iReport and shared in a CSPAN facebook  discussion area the Police arrest the writer, enter his home without a  warrant, search his home without a warrant, seize private computers and  hard drives without a warrant, -- the defendant is told by a defense  lawyer that following a demand that he remain incarcerated by the Police  for a psychological evaluation he will have to remain incarcerated, the  defendant dismisses the defense lawyers services, the defense lawyer  returns and claims that he will be released, the defendant is released  with an assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial  that he did not want given his claims of innocence, -- the defendant  gives the published article to the Crown, his computers will not need to  be searched for evidence and will be returned "seizure without a  warrant not justified, a charter violation", the Crown does not drop the  charges and maintains the demand for the assessment order for  non-criminal responsibility before trial, -- the defendant is assaulted  with powerful radar from neighboring homes, criminal harassment  participants state that he "has to run away or die of cancer", the  Police come to his home 3 or more times and discuss intervention  (psychiatric intervention) that leads to incarceration for the  assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial and during  the criminal proceedings for the attempts to protect himself from the  powerful radar assaults, shielding materials, metal, faraday cage, etc  -- the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility expires, it  cannot be renewed given the fact that the first assessment order for  non-criminal responsibility before trial was "unlawful", the defendant  does not want it given his claims of innocence, there are no more Police  "calls of suspicious vehicles and discussions of psychiatric  intervention" -- all charter violation presented at trial, entering and  searching a home without a warrant, the seizure of private computers  without a warrant, not justifying the seizure without a warrant, the  freedom of expression, prejudice from the "unlawful" assessment order  before trial, .. , etc, all dismissed, the Crown does not present the  said victim, she does not testify and leaves immediately, the Crown no  longer wants to present their evidence piece "a printout of the facebook  CSPAN discussion where the article was shared, .. , etc, , the  defendant is acquitted."

     

    ""during  the criminal proceedings the Crown was replaced by another, the Police  members also seemed to be different people during their testimonies and  proceedings" the vulnerability of mental illness made the self  representing defendant hesitate in pointing this fact out during the  long proceedings, already having battled against one assessment order  before trial."

    Add your Story Add your Story