- Posted November 21, 2012 by
This iReport is part of an assignment:
Obama wins re-election: Your reaction
- “Why USC and not a black college, Dr. Dre?”, More Likely, Why Should Dr. Dre do this when the Traditional Black colleges have failed?
- Both Candidates for Mayor of Los Angeles Wendy Greuel and Eric Garcetti have the Endorcement of Past and Present Black Elected Leaders who are deceitful, hypocrites, and most of all a disgrace to the essence of what it means to be elected officials!
- The Only Individuals Fooled by Obama are Morehouse College Graduates and Other Uniformed Individuals who Respect this Charlatan. President Barack Obama is a liar and a disgrace to the Office of the Presidency!
- Unlike far too many U.S. born Black leaders or other prominent Blacks, other ethnic groups are less likely to betray his or her own community, heritage, trash a career, or be so un-American, deceitful, dysfunctional, and/or treasonous!
- Makia Smith you definitely have more sense than many Black elected officials, black lawyers, multiple members of the Congressional Black Caucus, many Black police officers, and misguided Black nationalists!
Barack Obama’s idea of taxing the wealthy will not fix this problem, and BO’s policies are destined to increase the magnitude of damage to the economy upon falling off the financial cliff.
Get ready for a possible financial Armageddon. It is inevitable that all Americans will feel the wrath of the financial cliff. Barack Obama’s idea of taxing the wealthy will not fix this problem, and BO’s policies are destined to increase the magnitude of damage to the economy upon falling off the financial cliff.
YouTube: “The truth about the fiscal cliff” Streamed live on Nov 20, 2012 by losangelestimes
Avoiding the 'fiscal cliff' but falling anyway, Average Americans don't benefit from budget cuts. What's needed in the U.S. is the opposite — more stimulus to jump-start job creation. And why are capital gains tax hikes always off the table?
by Michael Hiltzik, 5:01 AM PST, November 21, 2012
It would be bad enough if the purveyors of economic and fiscal misdirection had done no more than describe a certain event looming at the end of this year as the "fiscal cliff."
The imagery evokes an elemental crisis that can be avoided only by the heroic efforts of our statesmen in Washington. But in fact it's entirely their creation. The automatic tax increases and deep spending cuts could be avoided by the stroke of a pen.
But they haven't stopped with merely applying a misleading label. They've aimed their rescue efforts at fiscal nostrums that do nothing to address the truly urgent economic issues facing American workers and businesses today. They've confined the discussion of tax reform to tweaks that will leave virtually intact the most important tax break for the wealthy (the preferential treatment of investment income), while turning their gun sights on government programs that keep millions of Americans healthy and out of poverty (think Medicare and Social Security).
Make no mistake: The valiant budget negotiators at work in Congress and the White House are mapping out a plan for economic austerity under the guise of "getting our house in order." This is despite blindingly obvious evidence that what's needed in the U.S. today is the opposite — more stimulus to jump-start job creation, and more spending on infrastructure from roads and bridges to communications and electrical grids.
Do you doubt that? Then look at the paragon of post-crash austerity: Europe. Harsh budget cuts in Greece, Spain, Portugal and Italy, along with austere fiscal regimes in France and Britain, have pushed the Eurozone back into recession.
American policymakers are still talking about budget-cutting as some sort of moral imperative. Who benefits from this sort of willful blindness? Not the average job-seeking American. Most of the pain from this new regime will be inflicted on the middle class and working class.
President Obama has declared himself determined to increase the share of taxes paid by the wealthy. But he has also hinted that he might be amenable to proposals to raise taxes by ratcheting back certain deductions, such as those for mortgage interest and employer-provided health insurance.
Tellingly, one of the most important tax breaks for the wealthy never seems to be on the table: the preferential low tax rate on long-term capital gains (on assets held at least one year) and some other investment income. It's currently 15% but scheduled to rise to 20% if the Bush tax cuts expire. Meanwhile, taxpayers who file as married couples are paying more than 20% on every dollar of wage income they report over about $79,000 this year.
If you want to know why eliminating the capital gains preference is so seldom mentioned, it's because it's cherished by the wealthy more than any other break. In 2011, capital income accounted for about 42% of all income collected by taxpayers earning more than $1 million, who receive two-thirds of the benefit of the cap gains tax break. For those earning between $75,000 and $100,000, capital income accounts for a measly 2.3% of earnings.
Despite the cost of this giveaway — it will be worth $440 billion over the next five years — the deficit warriors in Washington are intent on cutting Social Security and Medicare. That's the aim of such bogus grass-roots Washington organizations as Fix the Debt and the Third Way,which agitate to pare "entitlement" benefits crucial for the middle and working class by cutting inflation adjustments and raising retirement ages.
Both of those organizations are connected to the hedge fund billionaire Peter G. Peterson,whose fiscal philosophy, characterized by hostility to those social welfare programs, has exerted outsized influence on the fiscal cliff debate.
The shibboleth that gives urgency to the fiscal cliff talks is the idea that only tax increases and spending cuts can rescue the U.S. from unsustainable deficits. "You can't grow your way out of this," former Sen. Alan Simpson, the Wyoming Republican appointed by President Obama as co-chair of his 2010 deficit commission, said on CNBC recently.
That sounds suitably admonitory, but it's not quite true. The vast bulk of today's deficits are not structural but cyclical — the result of spending designed to address the financial crisis and the Great Recession, the effects of which are still with us.
History shows that economic growth can do wonders to reduce government deficits and debt. The national debt as a ratio of GDP peaked at 120% in 1947, reflecting wartime spending. By 1958 that ratio had been cut in half, and by the end of the '60s by nearly half again.
Indeed, economic growth in recent quarters already has cut into the deficit as a share of GDP, bringing it down from 10%, the level it reached in the aftermath of the 2008 crash, to about 7% today. The Office of Management and Budget projects that the ratio will fall further, to about 3.2% by 2015, based on the assumption that the Bush tax cuts will expire, emergency spending will ebb, and the economy will be about 20% larger than it is today (not an unreasonable projection, providing that growth isn't strangled by spending cuts already on the table).
Such a trend line "would likely calm widespread fears of a 'fiscal crisis,'" economist James W. Paulsen,chief investment strategist at San Francisco-based Wells Capital Management, wrote recently. "Perhaps we do not need any Grand Bargain."
So what's the proper course for economic policy in the near term?
The economic record tells us that higher marginal tax rates on the wealthy have no correlation with lower economic growth. As a recent study of 65 years of data by the Congressional Research Service concluded, "The top tax rates have little or no relation to the size of the economic pie."
On the other hand, spending cuts imposed during slumps do have a direct effect on the economy — they're like sand in the gears of recovery. That's the signal from Europe about the consequences of austerity, reinforced by the fragility of an American recovery insufficiently supported by government.
Yet the budget-cutting juggernaut rolls on, apparently on the principle that if you're going to extract higher taxes from the wealthy, you have to offer in return more "sacrifices" from retirees living on Social Security, less healthcare for seniors, more transfers of crucial programs from the federal government to already strapped states and municipalities.
The Europeans must be witnessing the jockeying over the fiscal cliff with both horror and relief — horror that the U.S. is toying with falling down the same abyss as they have, and relief that they may not be down there by themselves much longer.
Michael Hiltzik's column appears Sundays and Wednesdays. Reach him at email@example.com, read past columns at latimes.com/hiltzik, check out facebook.com/hiltzik and follow @latimeshiltzik on Twitter.
Copyright © 2012, Los Angeles Times
Fed chairman urges Obama, Congress to try to avoid 'fiscal cliff', Ben S. Bernanke warns that the Fed would be unable to offset the higher taxes and budget cuts set to take effect in January and that they could trigger a recession.
by Jim Puzzanghera, Los Angeles Times, November 21, 2012
WASHINGTON — Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke urged President Obama and Congress to shield the fragile economy from the full brunt of the so-called fiscal cliff or risk another recession just as the recovery is taking hold.
Speaking Tuesday at the New York Economic Club, Bernanke warned that the Fed doesn't have the tools left to offset the one-two punch of significantly higher taxes and sharply reduced government spending set to begin in January.
"Coming together to find fiscal solutions will not be easy, but the stakes are high," Bernanke said.
The housing market recently has shown "some clear signs of improvement," but the economic recovery still faces significant head winds. Among them is U.S. fiscal policy, which he said "may intensify in force in coming quarters."
"Congress and the administration will need to protect the economy from the full brunt of the severe fiscal tightening at the beginning of next year that is built into current law — the so-called fiscal cliff," he said.
"The realization of all of the automatic tax increases and spending cuts that make up the fiscal cliff, absent offsetting changes, would pose a substantial threat to the recovery," Bernanke said.
He noted that the Congressional Budget Office and many economists project "a fiscal shock of that size would send the economy toppling back into recession."
If the White House and Congress can't reach a deal to avoid the fiscal cliff, the Fed won't be able to prevent another recession because it has exhausted just about all its monetary measures to try to boost the economy, Bernanke said.
The Fed is in the midst of a third round of stimulative bond buying, known as quantitative easing. But there is not much else the central bank can do other than buy bonds, a strategy that has kept short-term interest rates near zero since late 2008 and will probably continue until at least mid-2015.
Any deficit-reduction deal probably would involve higher taxes and reduced government spending that would be a drag on economic growth next year, Bernanke said. But that's better than the alternative.
"My advice on this is sort of 'do no harm,' and in that respect, what I'm most concerned about … is the full force of the fiscal cliff," Bernanke said. "The ability of the Fed to offset head winds is not infinite."
A deal to avoid the fiscal cliff and start reducing the soaring national debt will help ease some of the uncertainty that businesses have.
Bernanke said he could not quantify how much fiscal cliff concerns were harming growth, but said the effect of uncertainty was "probably significant."
The European debt crisis also is a source of concern. But Bernanke said that avoiding the fiscal cliff would reduce uncertainty and potentially provide a big boost to the U.S. recovery because there would be "a greater level of security about where the country is going."
Copyright © 2012, Los Angeles Times
….and it is alarming that better than 90% of the black electorate voted for President Barack Obama in both the 2008 and 2012 elections……when President Barack Obama has been inept, dysfunctional, despotic, self- serving, elitist and treasonous the entire time he has held political office.
Lies Don't Keep Us Safe. Keeping Us Safe Requires Respect for the Rule of Law and the Constitution. The government's argument is untenable. “The government cannot, under any circumstance, affirmatively mislead the court” by U.S. District Judge Cormac J. Carney
“ …….Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist. 'An employee who is asked about possible wrongdoing has only two legal choices: Tell the truth or say nothing”. (LA Times, January 22, 1998.)
........"Tell the Truth or Say Nothing" also applies to any U.S. President, Congressional office holder, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, U.S. Attorney General, court official, court clerk, Deputy City Attorney, Judge, elected official, lawyer, journalist, etc.