About this iReport
  • Not verified by CNN

  • Posted November 28, 2012 by
    Los Angeles
    This iReport is part of an assignment:
    Being black in 2012

    More from TheTruth53

    Unless a US Citizen has Dual, etc., Citizenship or Legal Status, a U.S. Citizen Would Not Have Constitutional Protections on Foreign Soil. The Only Avenue for Representation for Any U.S. Citizen Who Enters Foreign Soil Would be a U.S. Embassy.


    Source: "Obama Blames Rush Limbaugh and Fox News For the Partisanship in Washington" uploadedYourBlackWorld.

    I respect Rush Limbaugh because Rush Limbaugh is an American who respects the law and the Constitution. President Barack Obama has contempt for the law, the Constitution, U.S. citizens and legal immigrants.





    Maybe this is the problem, meaning far too many U.S. born blacks attended school, but the schooling did not go through them, pertaining to learning and respecting the Principles of Government, U.S. History, the U.S. Constitution, a Respective State Constitution, etc.


    I'm one of numerous U.S. born black descendants of slavery who with good reason has contempt for Barack Obama and other psuedo leaders like him.


    Unless a US Citizen has Dual, etc., Citizenship or Legal Status, a U.S. Citizen Would Not Have Constitutional Protections on Foreign Soil. The Only Avenue for Representation for Any U.S. Citizen Who Enters Foreign Soil Would be a U.S. Embassy.


    "Anchor babies and the Civil Rights Act" by RoseAnn Salanitri, Conservative News and Views, June 19, 2012

    The Fourteenth Amendment

    "The Constitution. It does not enable anchor babies.

    The US Constitution.

    Before intelligent discussions and possible solutions can happen, all aspects of the problem should be on the table. For instance, illegal aliens have abused the 14th Amendment to bestow American citizenship on their offspring who they birthed here. Congress proposed the Amendment after the Civil War to protect the children of slaves and to make them citizens. It reads:

    All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof emphasis added, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

    Like it or not, the clear reading of the Amendment seems to allow anchor babies – or does it? The phrase subject to the jurisdiction thereof is key – especially in the context of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which preceded it by two years. Of course you can argue that anyone living here is subject to our jurisdiction – and that would be a valid argument. But it would not be a winning argument. There may be a little bit more to the argument against anchor babies than appears on the surface.

    Anchor babies in early history


    To understand some of the finer nuances of this Amendment, we need to go back to the precursor of the 14 Amendment, the Civil Rights Act of 1866:

    An Act to protect all Persons in the United States in their Civil Rights, and furnish the Means of their Vindication.

    It reads:  Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power emphasis added, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens, of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States…

    The point is that to qualify for citizenship on the basis of being born here, you cannot be under the jurisdiction of or subject to any foreign power.



    For instance, the 30th article in the Mexican Constitution attributes Mexican nationality to a person who was born abroad if one or both parents were Mexican nationals or naturalized. There are ways to alter this by positive act, and change allegiance. But simply being born in another country is not one of them. The Mexican Constitutiongoes further: such a person of Mexican nationality born abroad cannot claim protection from a foreign country. The latter is meant to describe the person’s relationship to the State. That State considers them Mexicans and subject to Mexican law. This subjection to Mexican law clearly negates the conditions emphasized in the Civil Rights Act of 1866.




    Therefore, in both the 14th Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1866it is clear that anchor babies who are born to Mexican nationals are not American citizens by virtue of being born here.

    A solution to this problem exists, but not in the 14th Amendment. Not only is that not possible but it is an insult to the heritage of the descendants of slaves. They did not break our laws to come here. Someone brought them here, forcibly and diabolically. Giving them citizenship was the right thing to do after they endured so many wrong things. By contrast, illegal immigrants come here willingly, and break our laws to do it. One situation cannot justify the other. The illegal immigration problem will continue as long as we lack real leadership in this country. And it will continue until our elected officials realize that they are playing with people’s lives and not political footballs."


    ...and this would apply to all anchor babies of illegal immigrants, anchor babies are not American citizens by virtue of being born here.


    USC, 14th Amendment:  1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.


    SEC. 3.  (a) The people have the right to instruct their representatives, petition government for redress of grievances, and assemble freely to consult for the common good.


    Oath of Office: "I, (President, Supreme Court Justice, Congressperson, Assemblyman, Mayor, City Councilperson, Judge, etc. ), during such times as I hold the office, I, do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States (the Constitution of the State of California, Maryland, Illinois, etc., etc.), against all enemies foreign (terrorist enemies of the U.S., illegal immigrants, un-American  or un-Constitutional anything and everything, etc.) and domestic (treasonous individuals or organizations, any Police Chief who turns a blind eye to the actions of rogue police officers, unethical or criminal elected officials or public servants, illegal aliens or his or her advocates, un-American anything and everything), and that I will bear true faith and allegiance, to the Constitution of the United States , (State Constitution), and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter."

    ...and since illegal aliens cannot vote and do not belong on U.S. soil, these individuals do not qualify to petition or hold accountable any elected representative to the oath of office, or for redress of grievances, etc., etc., for U.S. or State jurisdiction Constitutional protections.


    Foreign Nationals are entitled to have the consulate or Embassy for his or her unique nation of origin for representation....i.e. as a U.S. citizen or legal immigrant the only resource that I would be eligible to consult for representation or protection would be a U.S. Embassy. Constitutional protections in any nation other than the U.S. would not be a reality or avenue for redress for any U.S. citizen in Afghanistan, Mexico, Russia, China, Nigeria, Kenya, etc., etc.


    "Proof: Obama Refused to Call Benghazi 'Terror,' CBS Covered Up" by Joel B. Polak, November 5, 2012, BreitBart TV


    YouTube: "Fox News Extensive Report On The Benghazi Cover-Up By The Obama Administration" by Published on Sep 22, 2012 by 68Truthseeker

    This would mean that President Barack Obama and the Obama- Administration are in fact at fault, blatantly inept, lied, and most importanly failed to competently serve or protect the life, limb and pursuit of happiness of the U.S. citizens killed by terrorists in Benghazi, Libya.


    "Republicans and Tea Party leaders"


    YouTube: Tea Party Racism?? uploaded by bignatt on Apr 16, 2010



    CNN I-Report: "Black in 2012 : A normalized struggle for the underdog" by DesireG  |

    Selected Comment:

    "You can thank Obama for the high unemployment of African americans.  His policies have actually 'put ya'all back in chains' as your beloved VP so elequently puts it.  Seriously - by providing more entitlements instead of jobs Obama has put African americans back at least 75 years.  And to think you are the ones that voted for him.  Lot's of luck!!" by 12wright




    To what you state in the above quote which is indeed true, Amen to the power of infinity. I can't figure out the reason why so many U.S. born black men and women voted for Barack Obama when BO doesn't give a "rat's ass" about the plight of U.S. born blacks.


    Furthermore, like any other elected official Barack Obama is mandated by the Constitution and sworn under oath to serve U.S. Citizens and legal immigrants, U.S. born black men and women being inclusive here.....

    ....and not amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants and his or her anchor babies.


    Upholding the U.S. Constitution is the primary duty of all elected officials which definitely explains why Barack Obama is meeting so much resistance in Congress, and BO is being defied by millions of Americans who actually  think for themselves and truly cherish being a U.S. citizen or legal immigrant in the United States of America.


    YouTube: Obama : Plans to circumvent Congress and Constitution after 2012 Election (Apr 23, 2012)by Published on Apr 24, 2012 by SignsofThyComing


    YouTube: “President Obamas statement on bypassing Congress and issuing an Executive Order for Amnesty”

    ....defiance to oppose Obama, the Obama Administrations policies to the extinct that no good Barack Obama has to resort to misusing a President's "Executive Privilege" to circumvent Congress and the "will of all U.S. citizens and legal immigrants" to promote the Dream Act, worthless ObamaCare, threatening increased taxation on the wealthy that will not happen....because the affluent will move his or her assets offshore and out of the U.S......not to mention the battery of high profile lawyers that the affluent, corporate America, or global corporations have in it's arsenal......meaning instead of the wealthy picking up the tab for the Obama Administration's waste of taxpayer's money and paying down on the deficit it will be you ( 12wright), me (TheTruth53), the working class, the middleclass, and the millions of everyday taxpayers for generations to come, picking up the tab for this foolishness to correct these financially devastating policies of President Barack Obama and the Obama Administration.

    .......while the illegal immigration advocates, the public service unions, illegal aliens and anchor babies, and millions of freeloaders take a long Siesta "doing whatever" at the expense of taxpayers.


    YouTube: "NBC, I do Exist! I am black and Voting For Romney" Published on Aug 22, 2012 by newsninja2012


    Obama to host Romney at White House

    Here lately,  Barack Obama, the worst President in the History of the U.S. is calling upon Mitt Romney for sound economic or business advice on how best to resolve the serious financial deficit problems and issues that President Obama and the Obama Administration are responsible for, conditions that can no longer be blamed on former President George Bush, the Republican Party, Rush Limbaugh, "Jimmy Jo Johnson", etc., etc.


    Lies Don't Keep Us Safe. Keeping Us Safe Requires Respect for the Rule of Law and the Constitution. The government'sargument is untenable. “The government cannot, under any circumstance, affirmatively mislead thecourt” by U.S. District Judge Cormac J. Carney

    "Insisting on honesty as the only policy, the supreme ruled Wednesday that public employees can be punished forlying,evenwhen they merely deny an accusation that later turns out to be true”.

    “ …….Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist. 'An employee who is asked about possible wrongdoing has only two legalchoices:Tell the truth or say nothing”. (LA Times, January 22, 1998.)

    ........"Tell the Truth or Say Nothing" also applies to any U.S. President, Congressional office holder, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, U.S. Attorney General, court official, court clerk, Deputy City Attorney, Judge, elected official, lawyer, journalist, etc.

    Note: All hypertext are a link to actual court documents, signed affidavits, official correspondence, and other reputable sources.

    Add your Story Add your Story