Share this on:
 E-mail
15
VIEWS
0
COMMENTS
 
SHARES
About this iReport
  • Not verified by CNN

  • Click to view PCSTEFANIDES's profile
    Posted December 1, 2012 by
    PCSTEFANIDES
    Location
    KIFISSIA, ATHENS, Greece
    Assignment
    Assignment
    This iReport is part of an assignment:
    Tech talk

    More from PCSTEFANIDES

    GOLDEN ROOT SYMMETRIES OF GEOMETRIC FORMS Interpretation by Panagiotis Stefanides

     

    GOLDEN ROOT SYMMETRIES OF GEOMETRIC FORMS
    Interpretation by Panagiotis Stefanides

    FOREWORD

    The publication of this book, under the title “GOLDEN ROOT SYMMETRIES OF GEOMETRIC FORMS”, presented to the International conference “SYMMETRY FESTIVAL 2006” in Budapest Hungary, mainly, has intention to present a novel theory-exposed also to two National Conferences in Greece- to the Scientific Community and to the wider public with interests in particular knowledge.
    This theory proposes a new Theorisis and Thesis of PLATO’S TIMAEUS “MOST BEAUTIFUL TRIANGLE.”

    The proposed geometric form of this triangle is based on a mathematical model, which has been analyzed, in connection with the relevant PLATONIC topics of TIMAEUS. The phrase “ΤΡΙΠΛΗΝ ΚΑΤΑ ΔΥΝΑΜΙΝ” is being taken as “THIRD POWER” and not “THREE TIMES THE SQUARE” as is the current practice of its interpretation in the topic 54 of TIMAEUS.

    LIDDEL & SCOTT dictionary states: “math…, power, κατά μεταφοράν η εν γεωμετρίας λέγεται δ., …usu (usually) second power, square, κατά δύναμιν in square, PI.T: 54b, …square root of a number which is not a perfect square, surd, opp. Μήκος, PI. Tht. 147d.

    In THEAITETUS, 147d, PLATO speaks in general about “POWERS” (περί δυνάμεων τι ημίν Θεόδωρος όδε έγραφε…”).
    That’s what Theodorus told us about “powers”:
    “The lines which form an equilateral and plane number we called them length, those the scalene one we called them powers because they are not symmetric, as to the length, with those lines, but only with the areas they form. We did the same with the solids.”

    Here, it is concluded that Plato by the phrase “…we did the same with the solids” (και περί τα στερεά άλλο τοιούτον”), correlates solids (their volumes) with “POWERS” (“ΔΥΝΑΜΕΙΣ”) as well (περί δυνάμεων …όδε έγραφε).

    In PLATO’S POLITEIA, topic 528B (Book Z), and Plato states: “After the plane form, I said, we got the solid which is in circular motion, before examining the solid itself. The just thing is after examining the two dimensional to examine those having three dimensions. I think, this exists, in the Cubes and the bodies, which have depth. This is true, he said, but Socrates these ones have not yet been invented.

    ABSTRACT

    In section 53/54, of PLATO'S "TIMAEUS", PLATO speaks about the triangular shapes of the Four Elemental Bodies, of their kinds and their combinations:
    These Bodies are the Fire (Tetrahedron) the Earth (Cube), the Water (Icosahedron), and the Air (Octahedron). These are bodies and have depth. The depth necessarily, contains the flat surface and the perpendicular to this surface is a side of a triangle and all the triangles are generated by two kinds of orthogonal triangles: the "ISOSCELES" Orthogonal and the "SCALΕΝΕ" Orthogonal. From the two kinds of triangles the "Isosceles" Orthogonal has one nature. (i.e. one rectangular angle and two acute angles of 45 degrees), whereas the "scalene" has infinite (i.e. it has one rectangular angle and two acute angles of variable values having, these two acute angles, the sum of 90 degrees). From these infinite natures we choose one triangle "THE MOST BEAUTIFUL".
    Thus, from the many triangles, we accept that there is one of them "THE MOST BEAUTIFUL.
    Let us choose then, two triangles, which are the basis of constructing the Fire and the other Bodies : "Το μεν ισοσκελές, το δε τριπλήν κατά δύναμιν έχον της ελάττονος την μείζω πλευράν αεί."

    Proposed New Interpretation:

    One of these two is the "ISOSCELES" orthogonal triangle, the other is the "SCALENE" orthogonal triangle, its hypotenuse having a value equal to the "CUBE" of the value of its horizontal smaller side and having its vertical bigger side the value of the "SQUARE" of its smaller horizontal side. The value of the smaller horizontal side is equal to the square root of the Golden Number, the ratio of the sides is equal, again, to the Square Root of the Golden Number (geometrical ratio) and the Tangent of the angle between the hypotenuse and the smaller horizontal side is also equal to the Square Root of the Golden Number (Θ =51 49-38-15-9-17-19-54-37-26-24-0 degrees). The product of the smaller horizontal side and that of the hypotenuse is equal to the "SQUARE" of the bigger vertical side, and the following equation holds:
    T^4-T^2-1=0 , T = SQRT [(SQRT.(5) + 1)/2].
    http://www.stefanides.gr/pdf/BOOK%20_GRSOGF.pdf
    [BOOK COPY AT THE IET LIBRARY LONDON].
    http://www.stefanides.gr/pdf/PROPOSED_GEOMETRY_OF_THE_PLATONIC_TIMAEUS_GREEK.pdf.pdf

    N.B. Kepler [ Magirus] Triangle is a SIMILAR one, but NOT the SAME and NOT as BEAUTIFUL AS THIS PROPOSED TRIANGLE:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler_triangle
    Panagiotis Stefanides
    http://www.stefanides.gr

    What do you think of this story?

    Select one of the options below. Your feedback will help tell CNN producers what to do with this iReport. If you'd like, you can explain your choice in the comments below.
    Be and editor! Choose an option below:
      Awesome! Put this on TV! Almost! Needs work. This submission violates iReport's community guidelines.

    Comments

    Log in to comment

    iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.

    Add your Story Add your Story