Anchorage, Alaska
![]() |
This iReport is part of an assignment:
Gun control debate: Background checks |
My firearms.
One argument I get a lot is "high capacity magazines". This shooter could have had 10 round magazines and the result would not have been different, because no one was there to stop him. Reloading is not difficult, and thinking that something arbitrary like limiting magazine capacity will keep us safe is beyond delusional. Anybody who owns a rifle that was "banned" during the AWB in 1994 knows it is a joke.
As for the Assault Weapons Ban of 1994: I bought a Romanian AK that had a pistol grip and high capacity magazine during the ban because it was still legal. The ban never banned the gun in banned FEATURES. And how well did it work? Well the North Hollywood shootout happened after that as well as the Columbine massacre.
Before you go and make irrational and emotional decisions, seriously step back and take a look at the problem. Those guns did not pick themselves up and kill people, there were demented people behind them, the source of the killing. Even if you remove weapons, you still haven't cured the mindset of a person who wants to commit a crime.
- TAGS:
- GROUPS:
What do you think of this story?
iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.




Comments