Share this on:
 E-mail
53
VIEWS
 
RECOMMENDS
0
SHARES
About this iReport
  • Not vetted for CNN

  • Click to view singharun's profile
    Posted February 3, 2013 by
    singharun

    More from singharun

    New "Indian anti-Rape Ordinance" fails to address violence embedded in Marital Rape

     

    Former top cop and social activist Kiran Bedi has welcomed a new  anti-rape law ordinance that was cleared by the Union Cabinet on Friday.

     

    Speaking to media, Bedi said: "I think the people demand a holistic response. It is a very part law response."

     

    "Very  well, it is a beginning made. But it is still a long way to go because  the Justice Verma recommendations are a holistic correction," she said.

     

    The ordinance, based on the recommendations of the Justice J S Verma Committee and going beyond, proposes to replace the word 'rape' with 'sexual assault' to expand the definition of all types sexual crimes against women.

     

    But Domestic Rape is still excluded in the new Law.So it seems Indian Law allows Domestic Rape.Or when a Husband has forced sex with his wife.So Forced Spousal sex remain legal.

     

    It also proposes enhanced punishment for other crimes against women like stalking, voyeurism, acid attacks, indecent gestures like words and inappropriate touch and brings into its ambit 'marital rape'.

     

    The Union Cabinet, at a specially-convened meeting just three weeks ahead of the Budget Session of Parliament, went beyond the Verma Committee's recommendation by providing for capital punishment in the cases where rape leads to death of the victim or leaves her in "persistent vegetative state".

     

    In such cases, the minimum punishment will be 20 years in jail which can be extended to the natural life of the convict or death, sources said, adding discretion will be with the court.

     

    Being brought against the backdrop of the gang rape and brutal assault of a 23-year-old girl in Delhi in December, the ordinance entails changes in the criminal law by amending Indian Penal Code (IPC), Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) and the Evidence Act.

     

    The government will now recommend to President Pranab Mukherjee to promulgate the ordinance with immediate effect.

     

    "We believe that this is a progressive piece of legislation and is consistent with felt sensitivities of the nation in the aftermath of outrageous gangrape in Delhi," law minister Ashwani Kumar said.

     

    After the Delhi gan grape incident, which shocked the nation, there were vociferous demands for death penalty, but the Verma committee has not favoured it.

     

    The government has rejected a recommendation of the Verma panel on Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act that no sanction would be required if the armed forces personnel are accused of a crime against woman.

     

    In a bid to make the law women friendly, the ordinance suggests that only a woman police officer will take the statement of the victim of the sexual crime.

     

    Women under 18 years will not be confronted with the accused but provision of cross examination has been retained.

     

    There will be no personal appearance of witnesses before police officers.

     

    The IPC allows the court to impose a lower sentence. The ordinance takes away the power of the court to lower the sentence.

     

    Penalty in term of year in jail has been recommended for a government servant if he does not cooperate on sexual offence case or harms the process of law. The panel had recommended five years in jail.

     

    While accepting the recommendation to record the statement by police officers of the person reporting the crime at his or her residence, the government has made optional suggestion to videograph the proceedings.

     

    The ordinance says that if a person facing acid attack kills the accused in the process of self-defence, then she will be protected under the 'right to self defence'.

     

    Compensation for acid attack victims "adequate to meet at least the medical expenses incurred" by her has not been accepted by the government.

     

    The All India Democratic Women’s president Shyamali Gupta  said the ordinance did not address amendments in respect of the  culpability of the state and punishment to officers who trivialised  their responsibility; a review of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act;  and the issue of bringing Army personnel under the jurisdiction of  criminal law. It also ignored sexual autonomy, violence embedded in  marital rape, the concerns of those with alternative sexualities.

     

    The Communist Party of India (Marxist) has denounced the ordinance which  the Union Cabinet issued on Friday to curb sexual violence against  women.

    When Parliament was to convene for the budget session in three weeks,  the promulgation of the ordinance ran counter to democratic norms, a  statement issued by the Polit Bureau said on Saturday.

    “The ordinance rejects the Verma Committee’s recommendations on issues  like making rape a gender-specific crime…, increasing the punishment to  public servants for dereliction of duty and increasing the punishment  for acid attacks and… compensation for victims, and is highly selective  about the other recommendations. The ordinance has thus done injustice  to the Verma Committee’s report and appears to be a diversion from the  serious issues… of state culpability [and] inclusion of armed forces in  the ambit of the criminal law with an amendment suggested to it,” the  statement said.

    As for the death penalty, the category of the rarest of rare cases had  already been part of the legal framework and would include cases of rape  and murder, and this was reiterated by Justice Verma, the party said.

    • TAGS:

    What do you think of this story?

    Select one of the options below. Your feedback will help tell CNN producers what to do with this iReport. If you'd like, you can explain your choice in the comments below.
    Be and editor! Choose an option below:
      Awesome! Put this on TV! Almost! Needs work. This submission violates iReport's community guidelines.

    Comments

    Log in to comment

    iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.

    Add your Story Add your Story