- Posted February 22, 2013 by
- cycloneous Follow
Connecticut
![]() |
This iReport is part of an assignment:
Sound-off |
States Consider Gun Insurance for Law Abiding American Citizens Who Possess Firearms
While this sounds like a good idea on paper, several questions do arise, why do we continuously punish law abiding American citizens who possess firearms to protect their homes, property, themselves and most important their families? A second question that arises is this, to which I think is the most important, will the common criminal with a violent criminal history be purchasing this insurance? Will they go through the background checks as required by other law abiding American citizens who wish to possess firearms for the reasons state above?
Story Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/22/us/in-gun-debate-a-bigger-role-seen-for-insurers.html
What do you think of this story?
iReport welcomes a lively discussion, so comments on iReports are not pre-screened before they post. See the iReport community guidelines for details about content that is not welcome on iReport.



Comments